From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: can Gnus simply use the Emacs bug tracker? Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:33:26 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87r56em0mx.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <8762rk2vah.fsf@lifelogs.com> <6iy64gxk4z.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87lj0gyxld.fsf@lifelogs.com> <877hbzxj11.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8739mmvrbe.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ei654pyi.fsf@lifelogs.com> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1309275348 17460 80.91.229.12 (28 Jun 2011 15:35:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 15:35:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 28 17:35:43 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QbaKB-0003H9-T4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:35:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37797 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbaKA-0008S3-RA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 11:35:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:36014) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbaJm-0008Qs-CH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 11:35:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbaJi-0007I3-Ci for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 11:35:13 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:50307) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbaJh-0007Hl-Qz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 11:35:10 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QbaJe-0002zv-89 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:35:06 +0200 Original-Received: from 38.98.147.133 ([38.98.147.133]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:35:06 +0200 Original-Received: from tzz by 38.98.147.133 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:35:06 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 23 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 38.98.147.133 X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:i4wcrh1PxgY4R7IdIEuKiFM8dDI= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:141129 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:79232 Archived-At: On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 18:40:51 +0100 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: LMI> Ted Zlatanov writes: >> New look: >> >> To: submit@debbugs.gnu.org (The Gnus Bugfixing Girls + Boys) >> Subject: >> From: Ted Zlatanov >> --text follows this line-- >> Package: gnus >> No Gnus v0.14 LMI> I think the Gnus variable snarfer and stuff should just be removed, and LMI> gnus-bug should just be a shim over report-emacs-bugs. The variables LMI> that are picked out can be somewhat sensitive, and not all that useful. LMI> The standard report-emacs-bugs data is more useful, I think. I think if people are using `gnus-bug' and not `report-emacs-bug' they probably have a problem with Gnus, so it makes sense to dig into their Gnus settings. Please change it as you see fit, though; I have no strong feelings about this. Ted