From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6935: 24.0.50; doc for `font-lock-maximum-decoration' Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 23:54:34 -0400 Message-ID: <87r55j2cn9.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <0AEEE18115BA49E58E42C1604867D444@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1311306923 19253 80.91.229.12 (22 Jul 2011 03:55:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 03:55:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6935@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 22 05:55:19 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qk6pb-0003l5-44 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 05:55:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37181 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qk6pa-0004I7-PQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 23:55:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:60027) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qk6pW-0004HE-2s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 23:55:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qk6pL-00085f-7B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 23:55:13 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52400) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qk6pK-00085H-VA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 23:55:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qk6pK-0002tS-J0; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 23:55:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 03:55:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6935 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 6935-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6935.131130688711093 (code B ref 6935); Fri, 22 Jul 2011 03:55:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6935) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jul 2011 03:54:47 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qk6p4-0002ss-6E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 23:54:46 -0400 Original-Received: from vm-emlprdomr-04.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.145]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qk6p1-0002sg-U7 for 6935@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 23:54:44 -0400 Original-Received: from furball (c-76-28-93-216.hsd1.ct.comcast.net [76.28.93.216]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-04.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6M3sYic010211 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 21 Jul 2011 23:54:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 14 Jul 2011 15:49:41 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.145 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 23:55:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:49543 Archived-At: Maybe we should obsolete font-lock-maximum-decoration in 24.2. The concept of decoration levels hasn't been very useful, and removing this user option is a good first step to get rid of it.