From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9241: Gnus dynamic "Date:" should not update every second Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 20:27:17 +0200 Message-ID: <87r551t4l6.fsf@wanadoo.es> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1312482511 24282 80.91.229.12 (4 Aug 2011 18:28:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 18:28:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9241@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 04 20:28:26 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qp2eg-000310-6X for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 20:28:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40009 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qp2ef-0007b2-N5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 14:28:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:53363) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qp2ec-0007ah-Mq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 14:28:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qp2eb-00008W-CZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 14:28:22 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39581) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qp2eb-00008S-B8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 14:28:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qp2fF-0004Nr-L9; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 14:29:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 18:29:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9241 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9241-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9241.131248248616786 (code B ref 9241); Thu, 04 Aug 2011 18:29:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9241) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2011 18:28:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qp2eM-0004Mg-BS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 14:28:06 -0400 Original-Received: from impaqm2.telefonica.net ([213.4.138.18] helo=telefonica.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qp2eI-0004ME-BV for 9241@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 14:28:04 -0400 Original-Received: from IMPmailhost1.adm.correo ([10.20.102.38]) by IMPaqm2.telefonica.net with bizsmtp id G8zN1h00N0piX6q3MJTLTd; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 20:27:20 +0200 Original-Received: from qcore ([79.150.237.97]) by IMPmailhost1.adm.correo with BIZ IMP id GJTJ1h00H26mHuP1hJTKHr; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 20:27:20 +0200 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-original-sender: 981711563@telefonica.net In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Thu, 04 Aug 2011 13:14:42 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 14:29:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:49905 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > ,gnusThe dynamic update of relative time on the "Date:" line in the article > buffer is annoying. Annoying on the same way animated gifs and flash adverts are on webpages. [snip] > I'd be happy to turn off the "feature" altogether, Yes, please. [snip]