From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: What is ISO? Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 16:59:32 +0800 Message-ID: <87r51wmavf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87wrbs5vsx.fsf@gnu.org> <87zkglbqzr.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <4EAAE352.1050803@gmx.at> <87obx0v49m.fsf@gnu.org> <4EABB686.5000103@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1319878792 30583 80.91.229.12 (29 Oct 2011 08:59:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 08:59:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juri Linkov , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 29 10:59:46 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RK4lV-0003Uj-F1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 10:59:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44334 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RK4lV-0007si-5L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 04:59:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:53956) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RK4lS-0007sd-Aa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 04:59:43 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RK4lR-0006MR-Br for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 04:59:42 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:51942) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RK4lR-0006MN-7u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 04:59:41 -0400 Original-Received: from [155.69.18.173] (port=57333 helo=furball) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RK4lQ-0005dY-Hj; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 04:59:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4EABB686.5000103@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Sat, 29 Oct 2011 10:17:10 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:145747 Archived-At: martin rudalics writes: >> Might as well omit "-iso-": >> >> window-iso-combination-p -> window-combination-p >> window-iso-combined-p -> window-combined-p >> window-iso-combinations -> window-combinations > > If I wanted that, I'd use, for example, `window-child' instead of > `window-combination-p'. Here I'm interested whether the object is a > combination in the same (equal) direction as the calling (usually > resize-) function currently proceeds. Then do window-directional-combination-p window-directionally-combined-p window-directional-combinations and make the arguments non-optional (so instead of a HORIZONTAL arg, have an arg named DIRECTION which can be `vertical' or `horizontal').