bug#12273: 24.2.50; complex text layout

[Kenichi Handa <handa@gnu.org>]

In article <955FEE1A-949C-4F36-A66A-9E1777AEB9B5@Freenet.DE>, Peter Dyballa <Peter_Dyballa@Freenet.DE> writes:

> So the Fink variant uses libm17n and a modern libotf with
> OTF_get_variation_glyphs and the MacPorts variant has a
> bit older software. I launched both with -Q and them
> display the HELLO file and edited it to contain only
> complex scripts.

Thank you for the testing.

> I made a screenshot of both Emacsen side by side and made
> from the Fink variant's display a transparent copy with
> text colour in red and tried to position that over the
> same part of the edited HELLO buffer in the other Emacs.

Could you attach an image file of MacPorts version without
overwrapping with Fink verison?

> A few differences are visible. I cannot judge whether
> these differences are improvements, except for one: the
> Gujarati word in () seems to be in the m17n enabled Fink
> variant not OK – there is a low "accent" moved to the
> opening parenthesis.

Please show me the font names used for these scripts (which
are, I think, not-correctly rendered):
  Arabic, Burmese, Gularati, Kannada, Sinhara, 

---
Kenichi Handa
handa@gnu.org