From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: fix for bug 10994 breaks ido customizations in major way Date: Sun, 05 May 2013 14:20:16 +0200 Message-ID: <87r4hlsjnj.fsf@wanadoo.es> References: <87ip2zm89w.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87vc6xsnhb.fsf@wanadoo.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1367756428 10068 80.91.229.3 (5 May 2013 12:20:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 5 May 2013 12:20:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Le Wang To: Leo Liu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 05 14:20:26 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UYxvV-0000cy-UT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 May 2013 14:20:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53683 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UYxvV-0005dh-E0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 May 2013 08:20:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56441) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UYxvR-0005dP-RL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2013 08:20:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UYxvQ-0003oB-L4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2013 08:20:21 -0400 Original-Received: from impaqm1.telefonica.net ([213.4.138.17]:11734 helo=telefonica.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UYxvQ-0003ns-Aw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2013 08:20:20 -0400 Original-Received: from IMPmailhost5.adm.correo ([10.20.102.126]) by IMPaqm1.telefonica.net with bizsmtp id YCHg1l00L2jdgqJ3MCLGGh; Sun, 05 May 2013 14:20:16 +0200 Original-Received: from qcore ([83.40.116.149]) by IMPmailhost5.adm.correo with BIZ IMP id YCLF1l00M3DUQuj1lCLGEF; Sun, 05 May 2013 14:20:17 +0200 X-CMAE-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=bANl1MxOKKE0XAgTJ5KDo1Nh9SH0otGhU58K7+V3S60= c=1 sm=1 a=DQlLCnKHR5QA:10 a=jB3pZ5H4rBYA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=sSE9TqpJnXXWdi4WNHITQg==:17 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=PL89Ndf3cn5XhL1VZaoA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=MSl-tDqOz04A:10 a=sSE9TqpJnXXWdi4WNHITQg==:117 X-original-sender: 981711563@telefonica.net In-Reply-To: (Leo Liu's message of "Sun, 05 May 2013 19:39:33 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 213.4.138.17 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:159331 Archived-At: Leo Liu writes: > On 2013-05-05 18:57 +0800, =C3=93scar Fuentes wrote: >> Tried it and seems to work fine for both flx and the original ido bug >> report about C-s/C-r with duplicates. >> >> Leo, what do you think? > > What is the performance like? delete-dups can be slow. Starting with 10000 candidates, ido flex matching enabled and flx disabled, I see no responsiveness degradation while randomly typing chars.