From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#5099: 23.1; Performance problems in Emacs 23? Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2014 16:17:57 -0800 Message-ID: <87r47law22.fsf@building.gnus.org> References: <84zl61daq4.fsf@cs.bham.ac.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391386811 32446 80.91.229.3 (3 Feb 2014 00:20:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 00:20:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 5099@debbugs.gnu.org To: Uday S Reddy Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 03 01:20:18 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WA7Gr-0008N7-Rc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 01:20:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43429 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WA7Gr-0003wI-DK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 02 Feb 2014 19:20:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43693) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WA7Gi-0003ti-TA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Feb 2014 19:20:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WA7Gd-0000iQ-9V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Feb 2014 19:20:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:32881) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WA7Gd-0000h5-5q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Feb 2014 19:20:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WA7Gc-0003dM-F0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Feb 2014 19:20:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 00:20:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 5099 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 5099-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B5099.139138675013895 (code B ref 5099); Mon, 03 Feb 2014 00:20:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 5099) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Feb 2014 00:19:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46900 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WA7Fm-0003c1-02 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Feb 2014 19:19:10 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:49273) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WA7Fk-0003bs-Jv for 5099@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Feb 2014 19:19:09 -0500 Original-Received: from [204.14.154.233] (helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WA7FV-00083T-TD; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 01:18:54 +0100 In-Reply-To: <84zl61daq4.fsf@cs.bham.ac.uk> (Uday S. Reddy's message of "Wed, 02 Dec 2009 08:46:43 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1WA7FV-00083T-TD MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1391991534.98142@3NtQGqyr/aCrflM1ceOoJg X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:84486 Archived-At: Uday S Reddy writes: > Now, VM mail files are raw-text. Saving them should be an I/O-bound > process. It is not clear why Emacs 23 should be burning CPU cycles to > save raw-text files and taking 3-5 times as long as Emacs 22. Is this problem still present in Emacs 24? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/