From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16582: Bug: tramp shell command doesn't read stdin Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 11:27:26 +0100 Message-ID: <87r47hsvld.fsf@gmx.de> References: <87k3di97pa.fsf@gmx.de> <87eh3k5pdb.fsf@gmx.de> <87zjm6rmi1.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391596096 6108 80.91.229.3 (5 Feb 2014 10:28:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 10:28:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16582@debbugs.gnu.org To: Sylvain Chouleur Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 05 11:28:23 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WAziP-0001od-AO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 11:28:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58461 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WAziO-00034E-SJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 05:28:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35919) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WAziE-00033j-RF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 05:28:18 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WAzi7-0006rU-Gd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 05:28:10 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:36182) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WAzi7-0006rQ-D5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 05:28:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WAzi6-0007ow-84 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 05:28:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 10:28:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16582 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16582-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16582.139159605530023 (code B ref 16582); Wed, 05 Feb 2014 10:28:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16582) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Feb 2014 10:27:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50201 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WAzhf-0007oB-0U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 05:27:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:58243) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WAzhb-0007o1-LP for 16582@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 05:27:32 -0500 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([93.209.68.221]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPS (Nemesis) id 0M3vCA-1VJqux2wOQ-00rYNq for <16582@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 11:27:30 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Sylvain Chouleur's message of "Wed, 5 Feb 2014 10:44:03 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:XY8eI7GSt+uqBFHMFfz6ROJzrg+NS86npv7dwHFPdJutOhSHl+z Lm+mol72gQqUzYCk50C5AN16QIQ1VPQhewLxXKdBr9iVSJ2Vrz7f+Pl/8MBN+tD400AEyDE 1DtJr4p8sc9CwK297aFNGL38aT325mkjz0m7/9+/0TStSxym5RblIO9wZ1tDkgJYy0cTh6j RTUsZdZExwbtNJ/TdKtvQ== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:84613 Archived-At: Sylvain Chouleur writes: > That said, we still have the original issue of the bz I raised: > by executing tramp shell commands in this way: > exec <<'EOF' bash > > EOF > > we loose the possibility to send user inputs to bash, so commands like > 'read' will not work. > That's why I proposed the two approaches to handle your problem (long > line arguments) and my problem (bash stdin) Please give me a concrete Lisp example how you invoke this. Otherwise I cannot debug; my examples do work. Alternatively, tell me what you have entered, starting with "M-x". Best regards, Michael.