From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15172: 24.3.50; (cl) `Porting Common Lisp' Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 20:45:21 -0800 Message-ID: <87r47e43ha.fsf@building.gnus.org> References: <6c879d35-9ac5-4fe4-8376-b8d920137f5a@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391834828 4588 80.91.229.3 (8 Feb 2014 04:47:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 04:47:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 15172@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 08 05:47:15 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WBzox-0000aH-14 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 05:47:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44916 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBzow-0007kl-GA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 23:47:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59369) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBzop-0007gy-72 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 23:47:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBzok-0004QG-5x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 23:47:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:41962) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBzok-0004QC-2a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 23:47:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WBzoj-0006vi-Sc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 23:47:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 04:47:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15172 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 15172-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15172.139183480726603 (code B ref 15172); Sat, 08 Feb 2014 04:47:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15172) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2014 04:46:47 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55978 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WBzoU-0006uy-Md for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 23:46:47 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:51349) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WBzoS-0006uq-Oh for 15172@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 23:46:46 -0500 Original-Received: from [204.14.154.233] (helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBzoE-0005CX-1Z; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 05:46:30 +0100 In-Reply-To: <6c879d35-9ac5-4fe4-8376-b8d920137f5a@default> (Drew Adams's message of "Fri, 23 Aug 2013 13:25:58 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1WBzoE-0005CX-1Z MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1392439590.67824@KBUfgoMur0YL2g1wufQHRA X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:84880 Archived-At: Drew Adams writes: > This part is unclear/misleading: > > "In Common Lisp, function arguments and `let' bindings apply > only to references physically within their bodies > (or within macro expansions in their bodies). > > It is unclear what "function arguments" refers to here. Does it mean > the formal parameters of a function or its actual arguments? Or does > it mean arguments whose values are functions? I think that's kinda unlikely. Introducing terminology like "formal parameters" here (that few are likely to understand) would just make this even worse. Closing. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/