From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13370: 24.3.50; doc string of `call-interactively' Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 05:16:23 -0800 Message-ID: <87r47dpwwo.fsf@building.gnus.org> References: <9968032D84DE49BE91638BC20A4C0D38@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391865488 30574 80.91.229.3 (8 Feb 2014 13:18:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 13:18:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13370@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 08 14:18:15 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WC7nT-0006ZO-Cm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 14:18:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46597 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WC7nS-00054E-VC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 08:18:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51364) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WC7nL-000537-N8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 08:18:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WC7nG-000731-Ni for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 08:18:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42700) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WC7nG-00072x-LX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 08:18:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WC7nG-0003ri-G5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 08:18:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 13:18:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13370 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13370-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13370.139186546914816 (code B ref 13370); Sat, 08 Feb 2014 13:18:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13370) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2014 13:17:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56716 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WC7n2-0003qu-PW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 08:17:49 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:58862) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WC7n0-0003qm-DH for 13370@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 08:17:46 -0500 Original-Received: from [204.14.154.233] (helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WC7mm-00032c-5G; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 14:17:32 +0100 In-Reply-To: <9968032D84DE49BE91638BC20A4C0D38@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Sun, 6 Jan 2013 15:01:04 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1WC7mm-00032c-5G MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1392470252.76267@G0ORqpJMH1VSOTD8WzYdgg X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:84957 Archived-At: "Drew Adams" writes: > The doc string would be clearer if the first parameter were called > COMMAND and not FUNCTION (as is the case in the Elisp manual, for > instance). The fact that keyboard macros are excluded can also be > added, to clarify further what the argument must be. I think the usage of FUNCTION in the doc string is probably helpful, since it then describes everything about the `interactive' spec. Closing. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/