From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Trunk still not open Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:55:05 +0100 Message-ID: <87r4659kau.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <6xwqfxhl88.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83txb1mcsy.fsf@gnu.org> <87siqlku0i.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1394807453 8486 80.91.229.3 (14 Mar 2014 14:30:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 14:30:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 14 15:31:03 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WOT8Z-0001T6-2J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 15:31:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45039 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WOT8Y-0002L0-H6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:31:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46801) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WOT8P-00021V-Kz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:30:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WOT8K-0003ix-FZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:30:53 -0400 Original-Received: from rs249.mailgun.us ([209.61.151.249]:51479) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WOT8K-0003ij-6v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:30:48 -0400 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kickhub.com; q=dns/txt; s=mailo; t=1394807446; h=From: To: Cc: Subject: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Message-Id: Mime-Version: Content-Type: Sender; bh=4dqBRbBv8XYsG8Jq7OpF2mE6Xlnu0SprEwGc7+Tet6c=; b=WTc8GvB25NPTQExEDYLFxOFY5KVZCWwoCKU+YOMY7Ul7AaV4s78tZ3pD9srJTUPrhYzV60Ry nX9GnSEyuf0XhPp7Zl4mO5t4+VZJyIckcoEOxj6jpFN9vs/4xmIcDiK3jyO5qE2x0YV8ZTqv NwsrOykHf3JdoMH57iJDAVYG/IE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=kickhub.com; s=mailo; q=dns; h=From: To: Cc: Subject: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Message-Id: Mime-Version: Content-Type: Sender; b=wzx0AcUP3YEMKjWNJmF8A6NJTiAsEb+55rkEngo63PiTJJ9xAk34JXJZcqEH/c6oaGQejU jFa8ia1qWUtyvA+mDNbgdbVJVEgOMMBCZmua08iDyIpvj5hEINIvDKo5Dy0klRD2/Qun2hU5 3C1rOlZtgog201jFvlCU3iwY05JRY= Original-Received: from bzg.localdomain (AMontsouris-651-1-244-140.w92-163.abo.wanadoo.fr [92.163.19.140]) by mxa.mailgun.org with ESMTP id 5323128a.7f563c1af570-in2; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 14:30:34 -0000 (UTC) Original-Received: by bzg.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 26A551C214FB; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:55:05 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <87siqlku0i.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> (Stephen J. Turnbull's message of "Fri, 14 Mar 2014 18:29:49 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-Mailgun-Sid: WyIxNjA5MyIsICJlbWFjcy1kZXZlbEBnbnUub3JnIiwgIjE2NDg4Il0= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 209.61.151.249 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:170359 Archived-At: "Stephen J. Turnbull" writes: > Of course there's no reason to require that *patch authors* write > docs, 3rd parties can do that just as well. Yes, but blocking code patches while waiting that someone else write the related doc patches seems very impracticable. -- Bastien