From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: is undefined Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 19:15:56 +0100 Message-ID: <87r45sye5f.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <874n2pl0uv.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83eh1s3nab.fsf@gnu.org> <87vbv4yjes.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <20140323.185028.76246748.wl@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1395598561 24717 80.91.229.3 (23 Mar 2014 18:16:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 18:16:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eliz@gnu.org, dancol@dancol.org, schwab@linux-m68k.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Werner LEMBERG Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 23 19:16:11 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WRmwM-0001rs-Es for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 19:16:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32957 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRmwL-0007bp-Rp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 14:16:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34412) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRmwJ-0007Y8-4i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 14:16:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRmwI-0007qW-C0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 14:16:07 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:46160) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRmwI-0007qR-9B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 14:16:06 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53333 helo=lola) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRmwG-0003U3-Gi; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 14:16:04 -0400 Original-Received: by lola (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0D571E2C88; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 19:15:57 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20140323.185028.76246748.wl@gnu.org> (Werner LEMBERG's message of "Sun, 23 Mar 2014 18:50:28 +0100 (CET)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:170880 Archived-At: Werner LEMBERG writes: >>> I suggest to add this (and other) solutions to etc/PROBLEMS. >> >> From my point of view, it would currently make more sense >> cherry-picking the fixes of Daniel to the release branch unless we >> get reports that they don't do the trick in cases where nulling >> XMODIFIERS does. > > Probably both, since older ibus versions still need the XMODIFIERS > trick, as Daniel has mentioned in another e-mail. Anybody have an idea why I never encountered this particular problem before in my history of using Ubuntu (though avoiding Unity)? While I=A0do remember various problems with Multi_key, I think the last time must be at least something like 6 years ago. So either they adopted ibus only recently, or they had some other workarounds in place? Since I=A0only got this problem after updating to 14.04 (probably the report for 13.10 is for using Unity?), this is sort of puzzling. --=20 David Kastrup