Re: Semantic of pcase `seq' and `map' patterns

[Nicolas Petton <nicolas@petton.fr>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 990 bytes --]

Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@web.de> writes:

> Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@web.de> writes:
>
>> > Sure, using "&rest":
>>
>> So that's missing in the doc of the pcase pattern, too, since it's not
>> an obvious thing.
>
> Thanks for the fixes.  But isn't the "&rest" part still missing?

Yes, it is, but my changes were not final.  We went through some more
iterations with Eli, and I will commit more improvements to docstrings
in both seq and map ASAP.

> And now, the second sentence for the docstring of the `map' pcase
> pattern says:
>
> "Matches if the object is a map (list, hash-table or array), and
> each PATTERN matches the corresponding elements of the map."
>
> where PATTERN is unclear for what it stands.  Of course, you can derive
> it from the context if you think about it, but that should not be
> necessary.
>
> Sorry for being obtrusive.

Don't be sorry, feedback is always welcome, especially went given with
good intentions, as you are doing.

Nico

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 512 bytes --]