From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: reftex.el autoloads Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 21:51:05 +0000 Message-ID: <87r3ijh1di.fsf@russet.org.uk> References: <87h9jqo9a5.fsf@russet.org.uk> <566B2BFC.1070802@cs.ucla.edu> <877fkj1q5j.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83si375x03.fsf@gnu.org> <8737v71oo0.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83r3ir5vrb.fsf@gnu.org> <87y4czz7ul.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83oadv58fm.fsf@gnu.org> <87h9jmks0u.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87zixexam5.fsf@russet.org.uk> <0ltwnjbj6q.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87zixagvs4.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83io3xzqo3.fsf@gnu.org> <877fkcyd7r.fsf@russet.org.uk> <56743E61.8060102@cs.ucla.edu> <871tajiiir.fsf@russet.org.uk> <8360zvwipd.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1450475499 7215 80.91.229.3 (18 Dec 2015 21:51:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 21:51:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rgm@gnu.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 18 22:51:33 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aA2vw-0007TC-5w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 22:51:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35233 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aA2vv-0004ge-DF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 16:51:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54870) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aA2vh-0004gH-O7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 16:51:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aA2vg-0006tw-WC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 16:51:13 -0500 Original-Received: from cheviot22.ncl.ac.uk ([128.240.234.22]:45229) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aA2vb-0006mD-1D; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 16:51:07 -0500 Original-Received: from smtpauth-vm.ncl.ac.uk ([10.8.233.129] helo=smtpauth.ncl.ac.uk) by cheviot22.ncl.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1aA2va-0006Ck-DB; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 21:51:06 +0000 Original-Received: from cpc6-benw10-2-0-cust45.gate.cable.virginm.net ([92.238.179.46] helo=localhost) by smtpauth.ncl.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1aA2vZ-00063m-TE; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 21:51:06 +0000 In-Reply-To: <8360zvwipd.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 18 Dec 2015 23:27:42 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 128.240.234.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:196493 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) >> Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 20:55:24 +0000 >> Cc: Glenn Morris , Eli Zaretskii , >> emacs-devel@gnu.org >> >> > Here are a couple of other comments. That's not the right way to declare >> > autoloads-force to be phony. >> >> I thought it was an usual usage, "I thought it was an unusual usage" Hmmm. Too late in the year, I need a holiday. >> > Also, there shouldn't need to be an autoloads-force at all: if some >> > other files need to be built they should be listed as dependencies of >> > autoload. >> >> >> Indeed. It's always been this way, though -- from a non-bootstrap on >> emacs-25 try > > Any reason why you need explicit Makefile targets for the new files? To continue with the same functionality as my changes, no there is no reason, and they don't have them. > Why not model them on calc/calc-loaddefs.el, which has not target in > the Makefile at all? I thought that this is what I had done. Phil