Re: reftex.el autoloads

[phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord)]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> From: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord)
>> Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 20:55:24 +0000
>> Cc: Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
>> 	emacs-devel@gnu.org
>> 
>> > Here are a couple of other comments. That's not the right way to declare
>> > autoloads-force to be phony.
>> 
>> I thought it was an usual usage,

"I thought it was an unusual usage"

Hmmm. Too late in the year, I need a holiday.


>> > Also, there shouldn't need to be an autoloads-force at all: if some
>> > other files need to be built they should be listed as dependencies of
>> > autoload.
>> 
>> 
>> Indeed. It's always been this way, though -- from a non-bootstrap on
>> emacs-25 try
>
> Any reason why you need explicit Makefile targets for the new files?

To continue with the same functionality as my changes, no there is no
reason, and they don't have them.

> Why not model them on calc/calc-loaddefs.el, which has not target in
> the Makefile at all?

I thought that this is what I had done.

Phil