From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Oleh Krehel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-25 a9c48d5: Additional fixes for file notification Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 23:28:51 +0100 Message-ID: <87r3g4js64.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20160222175244.30186.2617@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <87k2lwv5ob.fsf@gmx.de> <87egc4v4hs.fsf@gmx.de> <8bd4ec21-1306-41bf-aca7-5571a3014337@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1456180145 13792 80.91.229.3 (22 Feb 2016 22:29:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 22:29:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Michael Albinus , Stefan Monnier , Drew Adams , Emacs developers To: Kaushal Modi Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 22 23:29:04 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aXyyT-0001U2-NA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 23:29:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52406 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXyyT-0004Z6-1d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 17:29:01 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56616) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXyyP-0004Yk-TX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 17:28:58 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXyyM-0001Hs-Ma for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 17:28:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]:37538) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXyyM-0001Ho-Ef for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 17:28:54 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-x234.google.com with SMTP id g62so184906213wme.0 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 14:28:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=luR+kIuVJE3rNXBeoLrBdBEX+pvG8vtamm8RqjNht0Y=; b=kn28T+UH3wyU1nIpXUFdk1efSY+Ow8llVORByujltobf7aD1NUmZaml1NW/dp/AtKZ eWQ6x9NCcV8xESguqGKJ6WS9AoHeXr0rW4kvk8fF6ZTOWe7u4VL+epyYNpVcEVFk+nIy Yn0TH2khIGmIilox/rAWpE7fUtVoQMhUFnONv5tGVb027uz64JURtt1tgGjUf9vnRbxQ WLiD89qzlXGAmOKHF/Gwm7FasTAKTBn1e5OBYqfmiP2oG1opHPUEJhRUtXSfe9QhpHo3 iy4zASdtJoo7SnnQO32MUVsCEcY1YQ/I8eR0afquuuhnjwmLC1RMCfUdO9q+vJiCe5Da vS4w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=luR+kIuVJE3rNXBeoLrBdBEX+pvG8vtamm8RqjNht0Y=; b=CC12bCB3mbsDAgwwgXS9A5tBcYQ7t/NpktIktVJqJ+wvrsbR8uX7clYp2NzPgI5mjk 9NDYE3NGyyG3MeYmpBJObE0QmCTlzqjEPgRdgDcDnmXSDUKhir7SKfkyj6De03E8WwSK m7Q2Co0NWApXLRNxiHIbNhfXmwDxJHD4lv1Mgm2GdeoER6W81m8KX/DQxMkhf4XCxNsA XLCoTDhW7XbuyZ9xfKsqZgkUG/L0zwNhd7L1vwk+lUfEqEvmc2SWgxMxM1C0PJlnGeoR U/TPMjEOd2YKf1IiWrtFw8vyOt102AJNIlnntDJ/fmpY07xxP4BJZWiUXdR5ykrfIkCH z0jg== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOS3AIQJSO3bgBPILj837hvSRMwBN1uVAR/Fd1Ir742srXSVcaYuppB0GYzUCAWBBQ== X-Received: by 10.28.109.150 with SMTP id b22mr15832511wmi.27.1456180133373; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 14:28:53 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from firefly (ip20-32-209-87.adsl2.static.versatel.nl. [87.209.32.20]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w144sm22996057wmd.8.2016.02.22.14.28.52 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 22 Feb 2016 14:28:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Kaushal Modi's message of "Mon, 22 Feb 2016 16:42:46 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.90 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c09::234 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:200506 Archived-At: Kaushal Modi writes: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Drew Adams wrote: > > > It's insane that Emacs now calls these `cl-caddr' etc., instead of > calling them `caddr' etc. like all other Lisps (those that have > them) - including Emacs prior to this renaming. Hard to believe > this actually went down. > > > +1 > > I wholeheartedly agree to that. +1 from me as well. I recall recently Richard proposed that we vote on some new isearch feature. Should we vote on renaming `cl-caddr' -> `caddr' as well? Here's a list of `cl-' stuff that I like to use, which I think wouldn't bring confusion without a `cl-' prefix: `cl-find-if', `cl-remove-if-not', `cl-incf', `cl-position-if', `cl-caadr', `cl-rotatef', `cl-destructuring-bind'. I realize there are prefix-less aliases for most of these functions. But I'm not sure how long they're staying. And if they are staying indefinitely, is there a reason to use `cl-' prefix? I made a switch to the prefix some time ago when the unprefixed macros became no longer syntax-highlighted. But now since recently all macros are syntax highlighted, no matter where they come from. Oleh