From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alexis Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23087: emacs asks confirmation to open rather small files Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 21:56:33 +1000 Message-ID: <87r3ebniq6.fsf@gmail.com> References: <56F1245B.3090407@libertysurf.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1460462443 23633 80.91.229.3 (12 Apr 2016 12:00:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 12:00:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: William To: 23087-done@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 12 14:00:32 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1apwzg-0003Bi-7q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 14:00:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47945 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1apwzf-0006Qp-M9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 08:00:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51677) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1apwwO-0007SB-12 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:57:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1apwwK-0000H5-0U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:57:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:47752) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1apwwJ-0000Gp-SS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:57:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1apwwI-0002zk-De for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:57:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: <56F1245B.3090407@libertysurf.fr> Resent-From: Alexis Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 11:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 23087 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Mail-Followup-To: 23087@debbugs.gnu.org, flexibeast@gmail.com, r.3@libertysurf.fr Original-Received: via spool by 23087-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D23087.146046220711485 (code D ref 23087); Tue, 12 Apr 2016 11:57:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23087-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Apr 2016 11:56:47 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60087 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1apww3-0002zB-0H for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:56:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pf0-f181.google.com ([209.85.192.181]:35415) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1apww0-0002yx-Mm for 23087-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:56:45 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pf0-f181.google.com with SMTP id n1so12724501pfn.2 for <23087-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 04:56:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=lLX3roKKKCTuAcfNoQJYzB3MWFTlQSuT1FIguCmUFOc=; b=no5bNtkeX3LIH4wBIeKbfyc0iJQkQP5tMQ2NFeNgOyLTVo5cMY5WSoGhxQjvbvXEWR HNV8B+CDiThN1WLgmesg/Cn9E/xEye+IMfQQmnWwW2a6bt58HSmjtAnZkR/MN1wlIJOY tI6H1/oVZCtrq67FzxRfIt3pXUKzCzniR1LTTnxY1C0YS2nmp+1qXAiFHS8NrkPnxKRo I2lIVfGUa9uG9DIxJqWyuLPcnzQMjQpPvw1UEo/xvovmpXWa5I8GpoDD2em4raFeul3M p3YyVmbvJvETZ+hgab+2i6USX94legcPvWF3OevPhMpjsNyVRpRpKIE6WvYpmsPNlI6E +GgA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=lLX3roKKKCTuAcfNoQJYzB3MWFTlQSuT1FIguCmUFOc=; b=Q/sukx9uUJzdG5lGJxrM+6RqLO83ffZW/6Rpxci9tfeaL6GgIBDOmHwxcsEZ9ys9lD whBP/lZJ4xT7fWzC0nxq311d+9vBh923E/5L3auCDfRIWvjsBDExyNPKBMkqgtBL2V60 IexVTKaXzYSBQ1VHNEZ6gdX9zNMXcPfydAFM+8+HV342T04KYo8SOoa6WHztlYaoxnpj ey+FOdabQ7gtajfFUf0MQz4sasecRxzYZceIpQihSgoKJ+PiE6eOmdHzncyqQVnCBu3w MxFiiQN7tpFOHRJ5FaqrPQesTep5Xhm1jCukU7GKFR6Gu+J991SzOEvi3KaPG/BxpF4X EVCA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVhhTBMdujd8Yun3UaCCAG1xzRQM0nDFj90Ri8QcUvqjQydduG1CxsEJHLkm0v+7g== X-Received: by 10.98.1.69 with SMTP id 66mr4150206pfb.10.1460462198859; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 04:56:38 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost (124-168-216-210.dyn.iinet.net.au. [124.168.216.210]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p85sm43213765pfj.16.2016.04.12.04.56.36 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 12 Apr 2016 04:56:37 -0700 (PDT) User-agent: mu4e 0.9.16; emacs 24.5.3 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:116403 Archived-At: i just noticed that two of the OP's responses, and my own subsequent response to one of those, were only sent privately. With the permission of the OP, i here reproduce these responses as support for closing this bug. William writes: > Thanks for the information. > > Maybe it would be interesting to change the default behaviour > for all people who ignore the option ? Alexis writes: > William writes: > >> Thanks for the information. > > You're welcome. :-) > >> Maybe it would be interesting to change the default behaviour >> for all people who ignore the option ? > > Mm, i think it's best to leave it at the current size, for two > reasons: > > * Emacs is used in a wide variety of situations; not everyone is > in a situation where they're running Emacs on a machine with > multiple gigs of memory. i would suggest it's less > inconvenient for someone to have to say "y" to opening a > large file than for someone to have the 256M machine on which > they're working hosed by a 300M log file that was opened > without confirmation. > > * Which value should be chosen is likely to result in > bikeshedding, since different people with different > experiences will have different ideas about what value is > 'reasonable'. > > So unless others feel a strong need to revisit the default > value, i recommend closing this bug. William writes: > ok fine, thanks Now closing this bug.