From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24074: bug#24094: 25.1.50; revert-buffer error in CC mode Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 20:29:49 +0200 Message-ID: <87r3ac2t7m.fsf@wanadoo.es> References: <20160729175924.11811.qmail@mail.muc.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1469817103 3204 80.91.229.3 (29 Jul 2016 18:31:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 18:31:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Richard Copley , 24094@debbugs.gnu.org, 24074@debbugs.gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 29 20:31:30 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bTCZF-0005Nc-L8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 20:31:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32790 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bTCZ9-0002jH-Gf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 14:31:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34657) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bTCYv-0002gu-60 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 14:31:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bTCYt-0003kh-OI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 14:31:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:53643) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bTCYo-0003jq-6k; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 14:31:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bTCYn-0001S1-UO; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 14:31:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bug-cc-mode@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 18:31:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24074 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,cc-mode X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 24074-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24074.14698170035453 (code B ref 24074); Fri, 29 Jul 2016 18:31:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24074) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jul 2016 18:30:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50938 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bTCXr-0001Ps-2S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 14:30:03 -0400 Original-Received: from relaycp02.dominioabsoluto.net ([217.116.26.74]:43403) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bTCXn-0001Or-9R; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 14:30:01 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp.movistar.es (smtp09.acens.net [86.109.99.133]) by relaycp02.dominioabsoluto.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB81CD232E; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 20:29:57 +0200 (CEST) X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=8/50, refid=2.7.2:2016.7.29.130618:17:8.317, ip=, rules=__HAS_FROM, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL_FROM, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __TO_NAME, __TO_NAME_DIFF_FROM_ACC, __HAS_CC_HDR, __MULTIPLE_RCPTS_CC_X2, __CC_NAME, __CC_NAME_DIFF_FROM_ACC, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __SUBJ_ALPHA_END, __REFERENCES, __IN_REP_TO, __HAS_MSGID, __SANE_MSGID, __USER_AGENT, __MIME_VERSION, __CT, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN, __UNUSABLE_MSGID, __ANY_URI, __URI_NO_WWW, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE, __FORWARDED_MSG, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS, BODY_SIZE_1000_1099, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY, __URI_NS, HTML_00_01, HTML_00_10, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL, MULTIPLE_RCPTS, __PHISH_SPEAR_STRUCTURE_1, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS, IN_REP_TO, REFERENCES, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS, NO_URI_HTTPS, MSG_THREAD, __TO_REAL_NAMES, __CC_REAL_NAMES, LEGITIMATE_SIGNS, LEGITIMATE_NEGATE Original-Received: from qcore (83.58.75.30) by smtp.movistar.es (8.6.122.03) (authenticated as 981711563$telefonica.net) id 579A2B0C0012C7B3; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 18:29:51 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20160729175924.11811.qmail@mail.muc.de> (Alan Mackenzie's message of "29 Jul 2016 17:59:24 -0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:121693 Archived-At: Alan Mackenzie writes: > Could you be a bit more descriptive about the "chunks" that are missing, > please? Are we talking about lots of isolated 2-character chunks, or > just one or two larger chunks, or what? Are the chunks at the end of a > buffer, or in the "middle" of it? It just happened again here. The missing chunk is everything below the first 9 lines (the file has ~400 lines). Those preserved lines are simply #include's. The final preserved line was truncated to #include < The original was #include Prior the revert, the point was much below that 9nth line. The reported failure is not always the same. In this case was: c-determine-+ve-limit: Args out of range: #, -7246, -6746 Or course, now that I'm trying to cause the error for obtaining an stack trace, it doesn't happen :-( As mentioned on my bug report, it seems that the problem is triggered when the point falls on certain places on the reverted file's contents, but that's just my guess.