From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: When should ralloc.c be used? Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 17:22:37 +0200 Message-ID: <87r37784zm.fsf@linux-m68k.org> References: <87eg51ng4r.fsf_-_@users.sourceforge.net> <87k2djwumn.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83h98nidvd.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg3rvtsf.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83k2dihpm9.fsf@gnu.org> <8760p2wzgj.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <838ttyhhzu.fsf@gnu.org> <871szqwu51.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <831szqhbc2.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1itt79z.fsf_-_@users.sourceforge.net> <7baa18d4-2b09-caa8-005e-29008a383ad1@cs.ucla.edu> <83mvhwrgd5.fsf@gnu.org> <8539f38f-9a11-44c3-4de7-bb974c96206c@cs.ucla.edu> <8360ojpndr.fsf@gnu.org> <83wpgzo30m.fsf@gnu.org> <5a4bbe6d-08ce-e6c6-39d1-49c9cd6d1ffd@cs.ucla.edu> <83mvhvns9a.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1477236226 17035 195.159.176.226 (23 Oct 2016 15:23:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 15:23:46 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: Paul Eggert , monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 23 17:23:42 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1byKcY-0002ys-DX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 17:23:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41410 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byKca-00006j-P0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 11:23:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47539) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byKbp-00005O-6O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 11:22:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byKbo-00079D-Hg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 11:22:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]:54799) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byKbk-00077q-LA; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 11:22:44 -0400 Original-Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3t237g65rtz3hjTZ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 17:22:39 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.68]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3t237g2L6bzvkG6; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 17:22:39 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Original-Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.68]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YanA186R7Zy5; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 17:22:38 +0200 (CEST) X-Auth-Info: YbLuWLIsz0CgWIalPZOJSGUz/sMSDxJsNvegRk+8UgsUy8eOhen8FgsN+sFZXT4M Original-Received: from igel.home (ppp-88-217-17-110.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.17.110]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 17:22:38 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AB7E02C5301; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 17:22:37 +0200 (CEST) X-Yow: I am having a CONCEPTION-- In-Reply-To: <83mvhvns9a.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 23 Oct 2016 15:50:57 +0300") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 212.18.0.9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:208624 Archived-At: On Okt 23 2016, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Is it reasonable to require a version of glibc that still supports > __malloc_initialize_hook? When people upgrade to a newer glibc, the > previous version is still left on the system, I presume (for programs > that need them which were built against those old versions)? There will ever be only one glibc. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."