From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Joakim Jalap Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Overlay tree. Stuck again Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 15:20:18 +0100 Message-ID: <87r347qbx9.fsf@fastmail.com> References: <874m14rnl7.fsf@fastmail.com> <83eg07cr91.fsf@gnu.org> <87ziivqilc.fsf@fastmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1484317232 6231 195.159.176.226 (13 Jan 2017 14:20:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 14:20:32 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (berkeley-unix) Cc: Emacs developers To: Fabrice Popineau Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 13 15:20:28 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cS2iR-0001Ei-FV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 15:20:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41481 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cS2iW-00013M-17 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 09:20:32 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54579) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cS2iO-00013E-BL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 09:20:25 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cS2iL-0007NV-4V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 09:20:24 -0500 Original-Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:36048) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cS2iL-0007NN-0z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 09:20:21 -0500 Original-Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91F5520B11; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 09:20:20 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 13 Jan 2017 09:20:20 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h=cc :content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=vUDVeaR45dc8FI5FDJgI9GYuazE=; b=GMxMFx RCHd/5Nsq0gwEyR5bI2J/a/sVbDVTrtrJKog6MHuM15BGn5ObeLXoG+NsoQUBNdU VhfhuOMngxFyHk618ZsLNyg/hz+ZkLuzc3UY2xwYuCmyyB456H34mBiMkiCqVLx2 4KyTfb+mcCCitSr+/ZC7+rPF9AXt6H6/o6NyE= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=vUDVeaR45dc8FI 5FDJgI9GYuazE=; b=NNukCRDD0NC7VRQbJiAq5A6Bp1VC7fKqSDSvrYWivnWs3v /51QSFybIuO8Mu5lrWZ1UEiF0fbodMgz9rnptkX4M/SOCwea589qQhtUSZENCtIl h7LgiWEYCNsniI8I+VmmNQYQF1mbRnyOsz8ujBUfBESxV+QAgPKmOVt9YVhbY= X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: PuygdUZrzNFUAqGQHEsWGLFhNOZXCw0v2x1N5AZ/VTvP 1484317220 Original-Received: from genserv (unknown [5.150.202.248]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EDFE17E057; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 09:20:19 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Fabrice Popineau's message of "Fri, 13 Jan 2017 14:22:08 +0100") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 66.111.4.26 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:211249 Archived-At: Fabrice Popineau writes: > 2017-01-13 12:56 GMT+01:00 Joakim Jalap : > > However, I just had another idea about how to do this (about the 43rd I > guess), so I will try that and report back in a few weeks :) > > And the 42nd wasn't the right answer? Or what was the question? When the 42nd failed I decided to ask emacs-devel ;) > (Sorry, couldn't resist). Understandable :)