From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Yuri D'Elia Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#26153: 26.0.50; Garbage displayed at visual line boundaries Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 15:28:08 +0100 Message-ID: <87r31u64nb.fsf@wavexx.thregr.org> References: <87tw6q6bh3.fsf@wavexx.thregr.org> <83h92qyaqy.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1489847357 16103 195.159.176.226 (18 Mar 2017 14:29:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 14:29:17 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: mu4e 0.9.19; emacs 26.0.50 Cc: 26153@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 18 15:29:13 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cpFLx-0003QB-Ac for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 15:29:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53549 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cpFM3-0003Ov-1u for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 10:29:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53254) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cpFLu-0003NR-KO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 10:29:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cpFLq-0008A9-MH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 10:29:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:35839) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cpFLq-0008A5-Jo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 10:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cpFLq-0006H5-Bq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 10:29:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Yuri D'Elia Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 14:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26153 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 26153-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26153.148984729324059 (code B ref 26153); Sat, 18 Mar 2017 14:29:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 26153) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Mar 2017 14:28:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34038 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cpFL3-0006Fy-Fx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 10:28:13 -0400 Original-Received: from erc.thregr.org ([46.43.2.63]:42950) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cpFL1-0006Fo-FD for 26153@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 10:28:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [151.95.55.228] (helo=localhost) by erc.thregr.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1cpFKz-000132-Ng (envelope-from ); Sat, 18 Mar 2017 15:28:09 +0100 In-reply-to: <83h92qyaqy.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:130695 Archived-At: On Sat, Mar 18 2017, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Evaluate the test file, then move the pointer down one line at a time, >> until garbage is visible. > > I don't see any garbage when I do this, but maybe that's because my > Emacs is built without optimizations. Or maybe this is specific to X? No idea here. But I suppose so. >> as well some hidden properties in the line. > > What does this mean in practice? What should I try changing? The test case I provided is 100% reliable for me. > Please do, as the above commit had to do with mouse-highlight, which I > don't see in your recipe. This might take a while.