From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#28458: 26.0.50; Does Emacs support SAN (subject alternate names)? Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 14:22:57 +0200 Message-ID: <87r2v2ev32.fsf@gmail.com> References: <874ls58oc8.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <877ewwdvir.fsf@gmail.com> <87ingggoei.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <87377kduj9.fsf@gmail.com> <87zi9qgazl.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1505823856 4076 195.159.176.226 (19 Sep 2017 12:24:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 12:24:16 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Robert Pluim , 28458@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 19 14:24:12 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1duHZT-0000pO-H9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 14:24:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42539 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1duHZa-00011N-Pm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 08:24:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56067) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1duHZO-0000y0-EN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 08:24:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1duHZK-0001On-Gy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 08:24:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:38748) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1duHZK-0001OO-DB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 08:24:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1duHZK-0000Q0-75 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 08:24:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Robert Pluim Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 12:24:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28458 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: security Original-Received: via spool by 28458-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28458.15058237951532 (code B ref 28458); Tue, 19 Sep 2017 12:24:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 28458) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Sep 2017 12:23:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47420 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1duHYW-0000OZ-3u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 08:23:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr0-f171.google.com ([209.85.128.171]:46191) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1duHYP-0000Nm-LI for 28458@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 08:23:10 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr0-f171.google.com with SMTP id o42so2928215wrb.3 for <28458@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 05:23:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=R3cxT0iLFdyDzcn53ov0PFAIbQu9pz+zrrLOX8QKro0=; b=OPnfVXoqoO6uLbclNFEYwYymmfI5sq+QNIQ1agk15hf5aWqsKxWgUjfSXQangnJzXE 70Yt53ZCTZbmj+ppfVQ/bwfBWy6X2gDbZU6Rj06PyL1Qxi9tynfWESZb+aFHW3pcGk+I 1rfKTYaeoDqD1XNzgCvTWxi955k/bfdbDDLfJG+4taW5tlMouD/NOG4ENmJ+y/Fcda6X QOz8FMoxazyoKiTDhaJne+GjohjyDwFlwFb6m7nmjfUSyGxhEQ5XL/GF9ITN7YEP9HYU nFuRvcF+/zbv3yEGkdsgDefdNdZdZ7l2a9e7Hi5PJrfoWvsyb8cpUJoc5AuSdbUw2+th ekVQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references :gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version; bh=R3cxT0iLFdyDzcn53ov0PFAIbQu9pz+zrrLOX8QKro0=; b=YaRfDLeKiz8d//pv7KI4MPzu+jigL+R6Yz8/7wmA53DZI5eYNHbaMb/tYdqVIxWw7n 34BmiLL+Q0HDKu/8OOKLPx6KVK0I4u93LtMYc1BGMcR6nukC7Hmio9YSaodW8t6oBvtI mEtwqir0MBIEJSaFi2AjSYNZvF3OkHkJNcaTlZpE7AvOs4XngKb69y6A6FoWd54QVH0S 4ajRDHfPLHjGYmkK4G4ip0gfE+wUVCTnYNdNa05ShEUKEzlhIp83xYXI1U8AiZpfzgng tB8H22p+ARclDVj3YrDFpzVpP8R9TxnLybzlMRWyLA+KZipqTH2b63vQyxMhVWyE/zfz Da+Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUg4nI97kzkSlBSpVhMKEloBxakVR88Gd1iHL6ZYU4iobc5VAd0k sNSNentfbLC03W+8XzxbeZhS3p+B X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QA+ku78dIPYYCRAx0DxPlowD/F7US4BNwOt6Gl+grLQw0gDYLyYhut+Z/8lV1q3SRy1TEQUig== X-Received: by 10.223.170.202 with SMTP id i10mr1385913wrc.232.1505823779524; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 05:22:59 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from rpluim-ubuntu ([2a01:e34:ecfc:a090:284b:8a10:eb39:79ab]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c55sm3044781wra.38.2017.09.19.05.22.58 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 19 Sep 2017 05:22:58 -0700 (PDT) Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes In-Reply-To: <87zi9qgazl.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 19 Sep 2017 13:54:06 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:137119 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Finally, I got one of these warnings on a web site: > > `M-x eww RET > http://media.boingboing.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Autonomous_Design20by20Will20Staehle.jpg RET' > > But! It looks like this is a genuine error: Firefox gives the same > warning... So perhaps this isn't an issue after all? Also: that http URL redirects to https. If you access the https version directly, it uses a different certificate than the redirected one. Neither eww nor chrome complain about the non-redirected one. Regards Robert