From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: `thunk-let'? Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2017 19:14:06 +0100 Message-ID: <87r2t7wc9d.fsf@web.de> References: <87infp9z6j.fsf@web.de> <87zi90eehg.fsf@web.de> <87o9ocd6s4.fsf@web.de> <83zi7wr6jc.fsf@gnu.org> <87k1z0csxa.fsf_-_@web.de> <83k1yzqshk.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1510251296 9232 195.159.176.226 (9 Nov 2017 18:14:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 18:14:56 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: nicolas@petton.fr, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 09 19:14:50 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eCrLm-0002AS-9x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 19:14:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38249 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCrLt-0002qG-ME for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 13:14:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33063) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCrLM-0002qA-Uv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 13:14:25 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCrLM-0003R8-7M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 13:14:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:58520) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCrLG-0003NF-3k; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 13:14:18 -0500 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([94.217.120.125]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb004 [213.165.67.108]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M9ui8-1eNst60hAG-00B2U6; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 19:14:08 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83k1yzqshk.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 09 Nov 2017 19:20:07 +0200") X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:6ttWTwl91tzE8Fy2Ih5q4Xw2/aiyHUVMaqOHGj64Y1YlKFrelzp X5xhoRQAjEznGpJTejlm1H3b371KLFvWI91YWct0NwVwbfh5dhk6ljE3vG9EFktuT3sCdrQ fu+LAul8ZmIEmmAt3cTmob2XcWoYjFpG61RAV8NmKJ7d6q8+EkjVjbPVp9feR+MQx59Dswg zl90hQcWW0xG4PXxvD4Yg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:gyJqEt1NeV0=:dPJKMRdYNrJA8em9ujoD9I nXZ75lgeNgbhJm1jmUhKpV3fZT1gbmnnDVDjjf3sWFOPeWykezWPjGMry2QZX0MI4pNeGEeWs X6R1nAgKqDtFXIbCU6gN2K2EGubKxPXXpx4TqIzzNTyT72W78J8pWItI11KEaxib34e8NHUML YQ6l1d3IshiG/wzi22vt8q2GpxK8fPBM8CgXnNridxpuJ8L3XCRqU9N0BGZWa19yr8j+Qq8SI az/QQYhvXDXj2F4Ul6Wg//1FNHy/djGfI6UB58sIIu2w95WSfTSKBav1z7zVjX1iD6z1yzZTM ev29qtRdtHeUV0PFAt/Hr4KGXMWtF6a06RMMjBJADHUHSMEqwoBlpODbbqgk2koYjqlCgBA14 AxhRfVrbLXVUrPYhPdT9b706ojyBOfPb9tSkCHc5qB69cTkhPa4W23auNFPDo8utjmfzjPC4Y rr/VhUmcjTneii2WUDE9lAkoDFY9yqo5x4w8eQ7iuj4yCIIEHzymreQDhQiFXt9k1WO8NkQcq uyEOfO8U3uBcjVZoJSbhbH+ixG2VBT9xbu1jn11H+WJ6qPIK7kLRcQVLP/3L3swwLlJJwnFxd YJ9Cep6+5qyZYQLRQDRffUVJrr4HGeCt0zylWPZUwsXjzuM8+mJ5Uv4tZ0Xca2NmWT0UUP1+u eC3EYZEggV6Hfh8mGFHn1V60a0zTg8dEnU89k2Pf4+Y6+WQIzkTGJTFZiYM3O0YDS867KhRl+ 8a+p586diooTibHnoLOoHHeraeIdkjCOltljvxaMMkniPuW/mDN4RgtUqeUQ8lelkOdPtQhb X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.4 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:220003 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > I'm not sure this should be in subr-x.el. That file is AFAIU for > stuff used _internally_ in Emacs, which this macro isn't. It's a very basic binding construct. Albeit the internals are a bit more complicated, I think it is in the same class of macros as `when', for example. In which way is `lazy-let' less "internal" than `when'? I'm not sure I fully get what "internal" means in this context... Michael.