From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Moving "manual.org" into core
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2018 20:19:31 +0100
Message-ID: <87r2ox8118.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87bmhooaj9.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87y3j8dw45.fsf@bzg.fr>
	<87lgf8f93b.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87lgf89lro.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87k1uq4n90.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87k1uql7it.fsf@tsdye.com>
	<87r2oy57tq.fsf@bzg.fr> <876069y1ah.fsf@tsdye.com>
	<876069cddb.fsf@bzg.fr> <87fu5d3uw6.fsf@tsdye.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54700)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <bzg@gnu.org>)
	id 1etI7e-0005C6-MW
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2018 14:19:39 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bzg@gnu.org>) id 1etI7b-0007Rp-Fu
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2018 14:19:38 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87fu5d3uw6.fsf@tsdye.com> (Thomas S. Dye's message of "Tue, 06
	Mar 2018 08:45:45 -1000")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: "Thomas S. Dye" <tsd@tsdye.com>
Cc: Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>, Achim Gratz <Stromeko@nexgo.de>, Org Mode List <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>, Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>

Hi Thomas,

"Thomas S. Dye" <tsd@tsdye.com> writes:

> Instead, let's move the project forward with the understanding that
> if it proves to be a bad idea, then the Org mode community will have
> Nicolas' very nice .texi file (with backports by Kyle Meyer) to fall
> back on.

Maybe we are miscommunicating, because that's exactly what I suggest!

I just want to make sure we have *at least* one year to prove this to
be a good idea.  I will probably not be the maintainer by then, so the
decision will be in the hands of the maintainer and the community.

> On the issue of your work on Org mode, I'm hoping your circumstances
> will allow you to be more involved, not less.

I hope having a new maintainer would help me to be more in control of
what I can focus on.  And it's not as if would leave the list :)

All best,

-- 
 Bastien