> Uwe Brauer <oub@mat.ucm.es> writes:

   > A moment ago, I followed up with a proposal to walk up the tree --
   > which turns out to be what the current behavior is supposed to be
   > anyway, and is what you expected -- because I didn't realize that that
   > behavior was already implemented.

   > Then I read the doc string for `find-change-log' and the behavior
   > described there seems to be exactly what you wanted and expected.

   > So I *think* the behavior you want is the behavior Emacs is already
   > supposed to have. Have you simply discovered a bug, or is there
   > something subtle about your situation that is not covered by the
   > current intended behavior of `find-change-log'?

Indeed I found an advice for add-change-log-entry, so I removed it and
everything is now fine, sorry for the noise.