From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Loris Bennett" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Mark set by ?mark-*? not deactivated by point motion Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 10:45:50 +0200 Organization: Freie Universitaet Berlin Message-ID: <87r2hrw5vl.fsf@hornfels.zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1537260509 28397 195.159.176.226 (18 Sep 2018 08:48:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 08:48:29 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 18 10:48:25 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g2BgG-0007HL-CG for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2018 10:48:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39117 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g2BiM-0004Yp-W3 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2018 04:50:35 -0400 Original-Path: usenet.stanford.edu!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help Original-Lines: 45 Original-X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1jNymmpv+fFNMjNT3KwhZgNLkarPRttJiXwjUvGMtF/004 Cancel-Lock: sha1:7/D9eZGZGOFhpzadVjlVkVHmrYo= Original-Xref: usenet.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:223825 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:117950 Archived-At: Drew Adams writes: [snip (36 lines)] > Whether Emacs should be consistent in this regard, I don't know. > But apparently Emacs presumes that if you use `M-@' to select a > word (put the active region around it) then you intend cursor > motion to extend it. And apparently it presumes that if you > double-click mouse-1 to select it then you do not intend cursor > motion to extend it. With my Emacs 25.1.1 `M-@' select the part of the word from the cursor to the end of the word. Moving the cursor left extends the region, whereas moving it right unselects when over the initially selected section and extends beyond that. So if I have able baker charlie and do `M-@' while on 'k', ker is selected. If I move left to 'a', then able baker is selected. If instead I move right to the final 'e', then charlie including the space in front of the 'c' is selected. Is that supposed to happen? What's the use-case for the moving-right behaviour? [snip (11 lines)] Cheers, Loris -- This signature is currently under construction.