From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13475: 24.2.91; accept-process-output hangs emacs on killed sub-process Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 18:37:42 +0200 Message-ID: <87r23nyyzt.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87boco3sqi.fsf@gmail.com> <87eeztg2s9.fsf@gnus.org> <28c1cd1f-1101-1402-6fe8-b9a677539568@yandex.ru> <878spxckep.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="32532"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Vitalie Spinu , 13475@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 08 18:38:23 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iHsVC-0008IK-TM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 18:38:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58392 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iHsVB-0000dp-74 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 12:38:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43457) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iHsUu-0000YQ-OR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 12:38:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iHsUs-0005Qb-Nn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 12:38:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42527) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iHsUs-0005QR-Jz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 12:38:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iHsUs-00070c-Fj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 12:38:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 16:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13475 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 13475-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13475.157055266926921 (code B ref 13475); Tue, 08 Oct 2019 16:38:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13475) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Oct 2019 16:37:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51348 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iHsUe-000707-JZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 12:37:48 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:39634) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iHsUc-0006zy-EG for 13475@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 12:37:47 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iHsUZ-0007RW-5C; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 18:37:45 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Mon, 7 Oct 2019 13:14:50 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:168667 Archived-At: Dmitry Gutov writes: > On 07.10.2019 6:19, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: >> By "was closed" here, I think what's meant is "was closed before TIMEOUT >> expired". If the connection is closed before the call, we wait for the >> entire timeout. > > And return nil? That sounds kinda brittle, as an API. Yeah, you have to check whether the process is alive before calling the function if you're looping over it. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no