From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding. Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 09:22:35 +0100 Message-ID: <87r1lkfkc4.fsf@posteo.net> References: <87zh0mmr54.fsf@gmail.com> <83lfc53whk.fsf@gnu.org> <20210203180142.seu6o3i6u7jhkyrh@Ergus> <83eehx3to5.fsf@gnu.org> <20210203221628.xgvvxjvh56gyswba@Ergus> <20210204070033.pm4ido4hq7a6twif@Ergus> <83sg6brhyg.fsf@gnu.org> <5588fb25805d486be704@heytings.org> <5588fb2580d7e46863dd@heytings.org> <5588fb2580f248753c30@heytings.org> <5588fb25800032b1a06a@heytings.org> <993b9ce74de32c5450c3@heytings.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6856"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: gregory@heytings.org, Drew Adams , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Alfred M. Szmidt" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 13 09:23:33 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lAqDF-0001hW-EN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 09:23:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36994 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lAqDE-00049L-HQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 03:23:32 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59932) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lAqCQ-0003jN-Eg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 03:22:42 -0500 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:56372) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lAqCN-0001Iu-5r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 03:22:42 -0500 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D1EF16005F for ; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 09:22:36 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1613204556; bh=1lhLYETjnTJv86Eyf61UDLJdWd4bKbt4tY7J7Wu2/l0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=d1vfh8xMv6enr83Bt54hIiK1hCYcpFAwZXMAukDL+ZNzZAri2cgpVzwKEMpEcK+wD Uq+MH/RPdF/eWgRhK8CoiXmssFWRwA3slB6dDZ8uSJg1AYsOBE2Sc3lPSv/TRAftgL BJ+zOgoY84ElBpgaF4+aq/4MLLe8RVOnXvEsabimx+naoJmHJlI4uQ5gukKdiYOsn/ OARETzDTm55WrmZQ3yDfOmx+kwEyLNkK9VwVBLgoZb7z2eUicpsrbNqqqzOs0fQHdm O9u4X1NaK4Xf9Q29DAfwraBnrE9uR/sJQVgzQrGX/xIp1RoQStfcIqAvLhcA8cyY/v mQYjKpZ0B1wcQ== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4Dd3JX0sDvz9rxG; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 09:22:36 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: (Alfred M. Szmidt's message of "Fri, 12 Feb 2021 03:21:48 -0500") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=philipk@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:264580 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable "Alfred M. Szmidt" writes: > You don't seem to be hearing that I want more > than just reserving one prefix key, `C-o'. > > Most (All?) keyboards today have a Super key -- why not allocate that > or parts of it to global third-party packages? I can imagine that window managers shadow that key for their own functionality -- this danger exists for all super keys. =2D-=20 Philip K. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGzBAEBCAAdFiEEbW+YL3e0aNnYosjIGB9bla4wszYFAmAnjEsACgkQGB9bla4w szb4Bwv/TYMDTRHZlJu7iwQBzFWlC2JY26kbDHVwOb37AerSm91rjIPu1nSjrLWV 68GRL3lWWFnAeRJkvNiWpojduX1eSrOd+7k0WoS+E3Iu0OTixjJqDCxzq73+KBfg +vTxtcnEEpp4ufXg647YLAx4aJeLXNxdrRbtMSiT1/5cvRoNy39CWlLvhO+aDfO4 yrORb1oXPnbvweQeKKmfvWET6I/fFJ617bcbgFlX7c1mnqk8USjJXmmNfbSG8lAw 5DGmMz17i6ss8mCHkm+WryRmgN9IqeUAaJJHnjKGOzXVAmfIvu2vZFbNHhBFcADw tqDMmyWVfVjfydgumw3C9sLQoVAgOoqKcg9+4124mJ0iEH/eNtFEhHmxMxn7rsKG XMYQYAQg7XOcpdaknaBjG/JeDI8zMfQ7/cQeXV5VgRg6eojMYU2c9hiZH1/7ps1d h9Vxzu1S5c5l3L3ktkcpByUAmL9gCfsSQpyQQtGNiCEmaOCPw939nmLfU7P5Q7yx QkDHYUK5 =otNJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--