From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#48592: [PATCH 0/2] Support plural forms of Author and Maintainer library headers Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 15:51:21 +0200 Message-ID: <87r1hw9r52.fsf@gnus.org> References: <20210522202519.32549-1-jonas@bernoul.li> <83fsyej6bc.fsf@gnu.org> <871r9xon5v.fsf@bernoul.li> <837djpkd8k.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnrpaery.fsf@gnus.org> <871r9xpt5w.fsf@gmx.de> <87v979mhv7.fsf@bernoul.li> <87tumtnvay.fsf@gmx.de> <87sg2dm9tp.fsf@bernoul.li> <87pmxgobne.fsf@gmx.de> <87o8d0mrsh.fsf@bernoul.li> <914C6F2B-140D-4681-A60E-C844A1DEFF29@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4029"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Jonas Bernoulli , 48592@debbugs.gnu.org, Michael Albinus To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon May 24 15:52:17 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1llB0C-0000u5-Jf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 24 May 2021 15:52:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37690 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1llB0A-00058j-QV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 24 May 2021 09:52:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33350) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1llAzy-00058V-VN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 May 2021 09:52:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59276) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1llAzy-0004wa-0g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 May 2021 09:52:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1llAzx-0003gK-V4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 May 2021 09:52:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 13:52:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48592 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 48592-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48592.162186429614118 (code B ref 48592); Mon, 24 May 2021 13:52:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 48592) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 May 2021 13:51:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42589 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1llAzY-0003fe-6G for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 May 2021 09:51:36 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:32844) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1llAzT-0003fM-Ch for 48592@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 May 2021 09:51:35 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=SZRYRAE8uD7CIfOShvx+wCsQzLT4FjsPRqS+tMha/kE=; b=R2VfYQ2k/GKyKft8zGWgWXpI3D 1KtfUs8tla/jEvU1WyGrT+sHR07R7SCyb4Gj3knvnmoyT8LTkBjTIojZ5uM699TRSRlZHSkjJ13wo p/CR24QL7wTEWjzy0ZxqixQkFR8iNumnYiePFvePsg8ue6WVgjgI53xmJ/vwVcXxP3Bc=; Original-Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1llAzK-00008I-7T; Mon, 24 May 2021 15:51:24 +0200 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAGFBMVEX9/P3T0tOdm5ts aGhPTEuBfX0/PDv////akPEOAAAAAWJLR0QHFmGI6wAAAAd0SU1FB+UFEhItFwT2mMMAAAGpSURB VDjLtZRLcsIwDIZJZtgnBfY00H2LzAGIhNeUTE9Q1/c/QvXLdh6Ubc3w0me9paxW/3La9pm0eiGh 8+tf+cAi5MKpebDiJJ1wbZb3VRajoX5ONmQgQEU+ZmAg56MBvCeVmsiJB/BRX5cRHAimVKQaXnwo KnUGAQA/3ovCQOzMb7AI4k8Gdp8tVh80aB+b4ppLfonGm4E1Iah8ojm65OzOE1BTXkKffLM5gRtk qJkENuC4KHhkiIAtk2oCErQyuOD3DyDmDMUAywh8qnDKvWb+ItySXHpXgPBAU3JQ92KAGHJYY8is nrelhkE4NICoErBPALJwV07OWZSwfn03uSSOkga+1G5MYEtjVCi/3orXVF31kQmsaXdiP85IBogI l1I/qrexJMmUSJ6G3ZS5swA4z896aqDTbIWvZaTJp6HKafI4vVt0QVutHTKlcXhrNNWa7lGSfpr2 ow4aOht81IruZ4uDeuvoaAuZ5vux2rk8JIHvyyU8Bt2doAmeHrf24DQq5tnWlq1vOz34U7UtHgXV /d4tlTfDZ9c1eFBknapYbdvnD490fgFY+rbxDBEtFgAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTpjcmVhdGUAMjAyMS0w NS0xOFQxODo0NToyMyswMDowMDO6TLkAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6bW9kaWZ5ADIwMjEtMDUtMThUMTg6 NDU6MjMrMDA6MDBC5/QFAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Now-Playing: Zonal's _Wrecked_: "Debris" In-Reply-To: <914C6F2B-140D-4681-A60E-C844A1DEFF29@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 24 May 2021 12:44:48 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:207125 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > I think this warning will be a gratuitous annoyance in enough > legitimate use cases to make the complaints serious. If it's okay to > take the 'car' of a list, then it should also be okay to call a > function which does just that. It's not like lm-maintainers returns > an opaque object. > > Again, if the others are fine with the deprecation, I will yield. I don't see any extremely compelling reason to deprecate it, either, but `lm-maintainers' (paired with `lm-authors') makes sense, so perhaps it's a better long-term solution to deprecate `lm-maintainer' (to emphasise that both of these headers can contain lists of people). -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no