From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg via Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: [External] : Re: Lexical vs. dynamic: small examples? Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 00:44:57 +0200 Message-ID: <87r1eunx92.fsf@zoho.eu> References: <4a9bddb9ec57299b3b0c@heytings.org> <87y293sdxk.fsf@zoho.eu> <87pmufs4er.fsf@zoho.eu> <87wnompmpw.fsf@zoho.eu> <87k0kmgycz.fsf@gnus.org> Reply-To: Emanuel Berg Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39083"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:05fySCtXao3a7bQ6CivpiooC/6A= Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 16 00:46:16 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mFOtT-0009wy-WB for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 00:46:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49098 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mFOtS-0000RR-Ap for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 15 Aug 2021 18:46:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33658) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mFOsQ-00086H-Ax for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Aug 2021 18:45:11 -0400 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]:41414) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mFOsN-0002fT-KI for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Aug 2021 18:45:10 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mFOsM-0008Ro-BB for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 00:45:06 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:132595 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > These are `lexical-let' and `dlet' Can't we have an official alias "llet" for `lexical-let'? (defalias 'llet #'lexical-let) (defalias 'llet* #'lexical-let*) It is much faster to type than lexical-let and smaller, also it would make it consistent with `dlet' and perhaps soften the psychological transition from `let' :) Ah... can't wait to remove all the ;;; -*- lexical-binding: t -*- from my code :) -- underground experts united https://dataswamp.org/~incal