Skip to the cpython primitive definition of the function/operation.

Skip to the cpython primitive definition of the function/operation.

[Hongyi Zhao]

See the following testing in ipython:

$ ipython
In [1]: import numpy as np

In [2]: a=np.array([1] ,dtype=bool)

In [3]: a
Out[3]: array([ True])

In [4]: ~a
Out[4]: array([False])

In [5]: np.invert(a)
Out[5]: array([False])

In [6]:


So, I want to confirm the equivalence of the np.invert and ~ operators
by inspecting the corresponding cpython primitive definition. Is there
a way for me to skip to them from the python script opened in Emacs?

Regards
-- 
Assoc. Prof. Hongyi Zhao <hongyi.zhao@gmail.com>
Theory and Simulation of Materials
Hebei Vocational University of Technology and Engineering
No. 473, Quannan West Street, Xindu District, Xingtai, Hebei province

Re: Skip to the cpython primitive definition of the function/operation.

[Emanuel Berg via Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor]

Hongyi Zhao wrote:

> So, I want to confirm the equivalence of the np.invert and ~
> operators by inspecting the corresponding cpython primitive
> definition. Is there a way for me to skip to them from the
> python script opened in Emacs?

anaconda-mode ... maybe

elpy ...

So much Python!

M-x list-packages RET

https://dataswamp.org/~incal/emacs-init/elpa.el

-- 
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal

Re: Skip to the cpython primitive definition of the function/operation.

[Hongyi Zhao]

On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 9:16 PM Emanuel Berg via Users list for the
GNU Emacs text editor <help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org> wrote:
>
> Hongyi Zhao wrote:
>
> > So, I want to confirm the equivalence of the np.invert and ~
> > operators by inspecting the corresponding cpython primitive
> > definition. Is there a way for me to skip to them from the
> > python script opened in Emacs?
>
> anaconda-mode ... maybe

I've filed the relevant issues:

https://github.com/pythonic-emacs/anaconda-mode/issues/417
https://github.com/emacs-lsp/lsp-mode/issues/3147

> elpy ...

I've tried this before, but it doesn’t seem to have this feature.

BTW, the more powerful IDE-like Emacs environment can be achieved by
lsp-mode and dap-mode, which is just the combination I'm using
currently.

> So much Python!
>
> M-x list-packages RET
>
> https://dataswamp.org/~incal/emacs-init/elpa.el

I use straight, which already includes all these repositories and many
more, as noted below:

https://github.com/raxod502/straight.el/blob/af5437f2afd00936c883124d6d3098721c2d306c/straight.el#L15

;; straight.el is a next-generation package manager for Emacs. It
;; clones packages into your ~/.emacs.d and handles byte-compilation,
;; autoload generation, and load path management. Dependency
;; management, powerful tools for managing your packages in bulk, and
;; out-of-the-box compatibility with MELPA, GNU ELPA, and Emacsmirror
;; are also included.


HZ

Re: Skip to the cpython primitive definition of the function/operation.

[Emanuel Berg via Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor]

Hongyi Zhao wrote:

> ;; straight.el is a next-generation package manager for Emacs. It
> ;; clones packages into your ~/.emacs.d and handles byte-compilation,
> ;; autoload generation, and load path management. Dependency
> ;; management, powerful tools for managing your packages in bulk, and
> ;; out-of-the-box compatibility with MELPA, GNU ELPA, and Emacsmirror
> ;; are also included

Haha!

Maybe it'll be included in vanilla Emacs some day ...

-- 
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal