From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Development Speed Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 11:52:40 +0100 Message-ID: <87r1a3vbif.fsf@telefonica.net> References: <87sfulx86y.fsf@telefonica.net> <87zgotos6d.fsf@yahoo.com> <87o858yle4.fsf@telefonica.net> <874k6zwsy0.fsf@telefonica.net> <87y24bk3oy.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2077"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:CBbiVmEsN0QaDX6q0IvclZK+tsg= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 23 11:54:21 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n0Ljp-0000Jz-9a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 11:54:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50464 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n0Ljn-0004Xk-QK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 05:54:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44842) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n0LiN-0002Uk-9e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 05:52:51 -0500 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]:40764) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n0LiL-0001UO-NR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 05:52:50 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n0LiJ-0008rp-Vu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 11:52:47 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -15 X-Spam_score: -1.6 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:282917 Archived-At: Po Lu writes: > Óscar Fuentes writes: > >> So you insist on supporting an obsolete, bug-ridden, unsecure and >> *proprietary* OS with Emacs users numbers that probably range on the >> single digits because... why? > > I doubt I rank among the "single digits". Well, you need 9 more to prove me wrong ;-) Seriously, part of my point is that if keeping Windows-9X support on Emacs is helping people to keep using that OS, GNU is doing them a disservice, both on technical and moral principles.