From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg via General discussion about ERC Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.erc.general,gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: Re: bug#53617: 28.0.90; duplicate checks in erc--switch-to-buffer Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 04:30:30 +0100 Message-ID: <87r18oa8fd.fsf@zoho.eu> References: <87ee4rutmo.fsf@neverwas.me> <871r0rusl5.fsf@neverwas.me> <878ruyqf0b.fsf@neverwas.me> <83a6fdbulb.fsf@gnu.org> <878rux9ql2.fsf@neverwas.me> <87bkztb4di.fsf@gnus.org> Reply-To: Emanuel Berg Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40493"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: emacs-erc@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:ayeGVTvpvtBu0TSu4OaR6Z2QGow= Original-X-From: emacs-erc-bounces+sf-erc-help=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 31 04:35:21 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: sf-erc-help@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nENTN-000ALS-2y for sf-erc-help@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 04:35:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51474 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nENTL-00020j-P7 for sf-erc-help@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 22:35:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35798) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nENT7-0001zB-LJ for emacs-erc@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 22:35:06 -0500 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]:34544) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nENT6-0008Vh-1e for emacs-erc@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 22:35:05 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nENT3-0009v6-Vl for emacs-erc@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 04:35:01 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-erc@gnu.org Original-Followup-To: gmane.emacs.bugs,gmane.emacs.erc.general Mail-Copies-To: never Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=sf-erc-help@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-erc@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion about ERC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-erc-bounces+sf-erc-help=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "emacs-erc" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.erc.general:1719 gmane.emacs.bugs:225652 Archived-At: Michael Olson wrote: >>> Apologies for the unintelligible mumblage. >>> Somehow (believe it or not), I was trying to ask whether >>> there's a system in place for keeping track of the number >>> of non-trivial changes a non-paperwork holder has made so >>> far. By "system" I guess I mean a person in charge of >>> recording such information or perhaps a table somewhere to >>> consult. But if it's less formal than all that, I suppose >>> I'll just rely on the git history and whatever an author >>> self-reports. Thanks. >> >> No, we don't have such a system, unfortunately. >> It's somewhat subjective what counts -- we try to count >> "lines of code", so whitespace changes don't count, of >> course, and other trivial transforms don't count either. > > What I'd sometimes do 10+ years ago is keep an AUTHORS file > with a list of who contributed, which files, and (in the > case of unassigned contributors) how many lines so I knew if > they were getting close to the limit. I'm not sure if that > would map well to the Emacs repo, maybe a side file like > ERC-AUTHORS, or just kept outside of the repo. I've seen a git command do something similar for the Emacs source ... posted on gmane.emacs.help not so long ago. -- underground experts united https://dataswamp.org/~incal