Glenn Morris writes: > Are you sure this issue isn't due to the changes from > https://debbugs.gnu.org/23324, which were applied in Emacs 28.1 (which > would make it a regression from Emacs 27, no)? Good catch. Kevin, could you try reverting 90e65c826fa (or applying (in reverse) the attached patch) and see whether that fixes the problem? If so, we could revert the patch for Emacs 28.2. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no