From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both? Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2022 10:56:55 +0200 Message-ID: <87r12xgv1k.fsf@gnus.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33752"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 56432@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 07 11:03:10 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1o9NPi-0008Vh-38 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2022 11:03:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36000 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o9NPh-0008He-1l for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2022 05:03:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40362) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o9NKk-0005Vn-69 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2022 04:58:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33599) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o9NKj-0006W8-Rx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2022 04:58:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o9NKj-00049F-Kz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2022 04:58:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2022 08:58:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 56432 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 56432-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B56432.165718423215887 (code B ref 56432); Thu, 07 Jul 2022 08:58:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 56432) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Jul 2022 08:57:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55729 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o9NJv-00048B-RR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2022 04:57:12 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:36884) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o9NJr-00047k-Mf for 56432@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2022 04:57:10 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References: In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=UoqFzl6keo7w+YSipg4xYOmcaSv0tlJmwHAo25CzEls=; b=te9bEp3fy/kM5Dy+q1fEsRY949 lRpRrRpfO+YY6mSQ8OLE4JVbvzoctbsLvZwIxG6nhxHwB5+Kk1e6TSzzTSxS/Sz4rz76Ceqoubjxx HG09hZj9TafGRi39+VAHdBoEyR32D3nX2brjxvS0IO0uQu4hr0tjP18JwxqRCDF2XVhQ=; Original-Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=joga) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1o9NJh-0006Dw-WA; Thu, 07 Jul 2022 10:57:00 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Kangas's message of "Thu, 7 Jul 2022 01:37:25 -0700") X-Now-Playing: Doubting Thomas's _Father Don't Cry_: "Turn A New Leaf" X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:236336 Archived-At: Stefan Kangas writes: > Do we really need both the `dig' and the `run-dig' commands? > > Should one of them be obsoleted? If we want to be able to specify both > query-type and server, we could consider using double and triple > prefixes for that. Or even write a transient. Looks like `run-dig' should be obsoleted (since it's just a wrapper around the "dig" program) and has worse output. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no