Re: Gnus: fix article to always display git diffs properly

[Luis Henriques <henrix@camandro.org>]

Hi Andrea

On Wed, Jul 10 2024, Andrea Corallo wrote:

> Luis Henriques <henrix@camandro.org> writes:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> It's been a while since I realised that some emails containing inline
>> patches generated with git aren't actually recognised as such in Gnus.
>> And today I finally decided to figure out why.  Basically, it's because it
>> is assumed that those patches will end with a signature -- and that's not
>> always true.
>>
>> Below there's a one-liner that seems to fix it -- it's not thoroughly tested,
>> but nothing seems to break.  Note that the other diff elements don't have
>> an 'end-point' either.  Would this change be acceptable?
>>
>> (And also note that the patch does *not* have a signature at the end!)
>>
>> Cheers,
>
> Hi Luis,
>
> thanks, would you mind sending the patch following [1] so we can discuss
> and track it into the bug tracker?

Ah! yes, of course.  That's exactly what I should have done in the first
place.  Sorry, I'll do that later today.  And thank you for your feedback.

Cheers,
-- 
Luís