From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Pip Cet via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Some experience with the igc branch Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 21:49:21 +0000 Message-ID: <87r05yax5a.fsf@protonmail.com> References: <87o713wwsi.fsf@telefonica.net> <86seqe4j4f.fsf@gnu.org> <87ttaucub8.fsf@protonmail.com> <87pllicrpi.fsf@protonmail.com> <864j2u442i.fsf@gnu.org> <875xna6pnt.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: Pip Cet Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34750"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Gerd_M=C3=B6llmann?= , Eli Zaretskii , ofv@wanadoo.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org, acorallo@gnu.org To: Helmut Eller Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 24 04:22:00 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tPvUd-0008pm-Mo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2024 04:21:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tPvTQ-0003ri-JO; Mon, 23 Dec 2024 22:20:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tPqIw-00068o-13 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2024 16:49:34 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-40134.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.134]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tPqIu-0002xB-DA; Mon, 23 Dec 2024 16:49:33 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1734990567; x=1735249767; bh=44mprChzekQOa+odu3DTU3lU9atf6aaRumAEN0uBMEA=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector:List-Unsubscribe:List-Unsubscribe-Post; b=DlA3Y3xdH2df/R/mFrnMgSKjdFU2fwVoJZZqfYoinstYWhlsteegJOA5YOHeOGcZF Pn7ThwEtaooEHrw5AM/ksRbTQ2iAQ/fTMOEZjGB5fIFI5IF4hTeZyg04s2P+u/vHUd malQI2+VlmgPYynTns8Edt1EnML9ZdwNZBG+/OTtCPYgad5PQVCsi+cpQB53w2K+fX zIc/1ydBpunJBd+ZJZvwnW5eMFTEUzLcLw5ByIyrOYeZttPdmkH03xKR8C7q9oEYwj 9JhrdR/Npib6CW0yJtb4KmpG9n9yMV59nHxmq1x77mqbz2foJdIicgmq28APD8ul5p c44ZX8SzTaUyA== In-Reply-To: <875xna6pnt.fsf@gmail.com> Feedback-ID: 112775352:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: 4d1a0ab8463103c305ff6fbcad4530f0ad2709c5 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.40.134; envelope-from=pipcet@protonmail.com; helo=mail-40134.protonmail.ch X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 22:20:43 -0500 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:326948 Archived-At: "Helmut Eller" writes: > On Mon, Dec 23 2024, Gerd M=C3=B6llmann wrote: > >> [...] >> Worth mentioning is perhaps that [...] >> directly after get_backtrace here [...] >> we access Lisp objects in trace_hash when computing the hash and in the >> other hash table code. > > Also worth mentioning is that trace_hash uses XHASH, which is probably > problematic in combination with a moving GC. Good catch. s/XHASH/sxhash_eq/ there, I think? And let's poison XHASH when MPS is in use? Pip