From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Pip Cet via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: igc, macOS avoiding signals Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2025 20:28:10 +0000 Message-ID: <87r05jiqxz.fsf@protonmail.com> References: <799DDBC5-2C14-4476-B1E0-7BA2FE9E7901@toadstyle.org> <868qrxnfrw.fsf@gnu.org> <87a5ccl2zx.fsf@gmail.com> <875xn0p3l1.fsf@protonmail.com> <86ldvwm190.fsf@gnu.org> <87cyh8nczh.fsf@protonmail.com> <867c7fncom.fsf@gnu.org> <87pll3ivzs.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: Pip Cet Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29990"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gerd.moellmann@gmail.com, spd@toadstyle.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Helmut Eller Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 04 07:50:06 2025 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tTxz3-0007eC-Ix for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 07:50:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tTxyD-0007Bk-12; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 01:49:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tToHL-0000kK-2U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2025 15:28:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-4316.protonmail.ch ([185.70.43.16]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tToHI-0000gq-6o; Fri, 03 Jan 2025 15:28:18 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1735936092; x=1736195292; bh=W0hDcLi4POYJ7ke5tsdMxDcMnv7hYd3i6e2biNNUXUo=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector:List-Unsubscribe:List-Unsubscribe-Post; b=T07FlpygMS4YbwP2WrRXrlOA5rNQsqxUazKsxaqUIJ8n2LWd3VXtY+MPLatpmRvGI o9eaHAuPrtpacPjKFa4rwCyW0VurB4ybL1EtXfYDNOSsEl7NYtAVdzOBaHG03WXod8 SomZuRnJ+QKDol3jBi4fdYWX7YqhljH9iFv6eF9HkCDleroXiTNcIWMup3g33BM4wG P1N07Flc8UqWzkBF8wbz2kyvF1rxmtzcQ3TVzRkOtzyzkw3xBpTc7fEYv1D+Y5u6av EdGXLrs3rrNM7sll5u3VV3ZOSDguJAoOtDnQhAk7/LJGUZ86HVNbayFBC3S8iZR/KC Dg+uYd3XNpbHQ== In-Reply-To: <87pll3ivzs.fsf@gmail.com> Feedback-ID: 112775352:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: a499dcac499d76b01b1caa04a402e95528716135 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.43.16; envelope-from=pipcet@protonmail.com; helo=mail-4316.protonmail.ch X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 04 Jan 2025 01:49:11 -0500 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:327647 Archived-At: "Helmut Eller" writes: > (In eval_sub and Ffuncall, it would also help the profiler to move the > maybe_quit call forward before lisp_eval_depth--. This would only matter > for interpreted functions, not in byte compiled code. Curiously, > apply_lambda doesn't call maybe_quit at all.) I'm not sure apply_lambda needs to, but if it doesn't, Fprogn should. (funcall '(lambda () . #1=3D(t . #1#))) loops without calling maybe_quit. Checking all calls to Fprogn sounds difficult, so let's put a rarely_quit in there? (Paul Eggert fixed some circular-code problems quite a while ago, so I assume this isn't something we can avoid by making all code non-circular before executing it) Pip