all messages for Emacs-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Mario Lang <mlang@delysid.org>
Subject: perldb and gud-print
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 21:06:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pti7p2kc.fsf@lexx.delysid.org> (raw)

Hi.

While playing with M-x perldb, I noticed that gud-print (C-x C-a C-p)
currently evaluates the expression at point, rather than printing the result
of evaluating it.  Just evaluating an expression is not very useful
since as long as the expression has no side-effects, no output is produced
in the GUD buffer.  If C-x C-a C-p would actually print the result of
evaluating the expression, one could simply place point on some variable
name in the source-buffer and execute gud-print to see the current value
of that variable.  With the current version of gud-print, simply no
output is generated at all.

Is there any reason why gud-print should not print the result of evaluating
the expression with perldb?  If not, please install attached patch.

Index: lisp/ChangeLog
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/emacs/emacs/lisp/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revision 1.5383
diff -u -r1.5383 ChangeLog
--- lisp/ChangeLog	10 Sep 2003 20:09:17 -0000	1.5383
+++ lisp/ChangeLog	11 Sep 2003 18:44:32 -0000
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2003-09-11  Mario Lang  <mlang@delysid.org>
+
+	* progmodes/gud.el (perldb): Change gud-print from just "%e" to "p %e"
+	to actually print the expression at point, not just evaluate it.
+
 2003-09-10  Mario Lang  <mlang@delysid.org>
 
 	* battery.el: Update Commentary and Copyright.
Index: lisp/progmodes/gud.el
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/emacs/emacs/lisp/progmodes/gud.el,v
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -r1.6 gud.el
--- lisp/progmodes/gud.el	1 Sep 2003 15:45:35 -0000	1.6
+++ lisp/progmodes/gud.el	11 Sep 2003 18:44:39 -0000
@@ -1261,7 +1261,7 @@
 ;  (gud-def gud-finish "finish"       "\C-f" "Finish executing current function.")
 ;  (gud-def gud-up     "up %p"        "<" "Up N stack frames (numeric arg).")
 ;  (gud-def gud-down   "down %p"      ">" "Down N stack frames (numeric arg).")
-  (gud-def gud-print  "%e"           "\C-p" "Evaluate perl expression at point.")
+  (gud-def gud-print  "p %e"           "\C-p" "Evaluate perl expression at point.")
 
   (setq comint-prompt-regexp "^  DB<+[0-9]+>+ ")
   (setq paragraph-start comint-prompt-regexp)

-- 
Thanks,
  Mario | Debian Developer <URL:http://debian.org/>
        | Get my public key via finger mlang@db.debian.org
        | 1024D/7FC1A0854909BCCDBE6C102DDFFC022A6B113E44

             reply	other threads:[~2003-09-11 19:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-09-11 19:06 Mario Lang [this message]
2003-09-17 19:06 ` perldb and gud-print Nick Roberts

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87pti7p2kc.fsf@lexx.delysid.org \
    --to=mlang@delysid.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.