Regexp for marking source code

Regexp for marking source code

[Ken Goldman]

The dired Q command seems quite useful, but
regexp syntax is obscure enough that I can't quite
get what I want.

What would be a regexp for all .c and .h files.
In a Unix shell, it would be *.[ch],  What's the
regexp equivalent?

Re: Regexp for marking source code

[David Kastrup]

Ken Goldman <kgold@watson.ibm.com> writes:

> The dired Q command seems quite useful, but
> regexp syntax is obscure enough that I can't quite
> get what I want.
>
> What would be a regexp for all .c and .h files.
> In a Unix shell, it would be *.[ch],  What's the
> regexp equivalent?

.*\.[ch]\'

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum

Org mode modifies files

[Sébastien Vauban]

Hello,

I am using the fantastically easy Org-Mode since a couple of
weeks, but encounters systematically an annoying problem: Emacs
always tells me my .org files have been modified (when I wanna
quit Emacs, or run CVS commands, ...) while they weren't changed
at all!

The only thing I did was listing my task entries with C-c a a,
that's all.

Any idea why it says they are modified?

Thanks for your help,
  Seb

-- 
Sébastien Vauban

Re: Org mode modifies files

[claudine]

Sébastien Vauban wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using the fantastically easy Org-Mode since a couple of
> weeks, but encounters systematically an annoying problem: Emacs
> always tells me my .org files have been modified (when I wanna
> quit Emacs, or run CVS commands, ...) while they weren't changed
> at all!
>
> The only thing I did was listing my task entries with C-c a a,
> that's all.

What version of org mode are you using? I think this problem was
introduced in version 4.41 or .42 and fixed in 4.43.

Claudine

Re: Org mode modifies files

[Sébastien Vauban]

Hi,

>> Emacs always tells me my .org files have been modified
>> ... while they weren't changed at all!
>
> What version of org mode are you using? I think this problem was
> introduced in version 4.41 or .42 and fixed in 4.43.

Yes, you're right, the problem disappeared by upgrading to
version 4.43.

Thanks,
  Seb

-- 
Sébastien Vauban

Re: Regexp for marking source code

[Dieter Wilhelm]

David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> writes:

> Ken Goldman <kgold@watson.ibm.com> writes:
>
>> The dired Q command seems quite useful, but
>> regexp syntax is obscure enough that I can't quite
>> get what I want.
>>
>> What would be a regexp for all .c and .h files.
>> In a Unix shell, it would be *.[ch],  What's the
>> regexp equivalent?
>
> .*\.[ch]\'

quick and dirty

\.[ch]$

since the likely hood of existing hidden files `.h' and `.c' is too
small for the hassle of typing .*

-- 
    Best wishes

    H. Dieter Wilhelm
    Darmstadt, Germany

Re: Regexp for marking source code

[David Kastrup]

Dieter Wilhelm <dieter@duenenhof-wilhelm.de> writes:

> David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Ken Goldman <kgold@watson.ibm.com> writes:
>>
>>> The dired Q command seems quite useful, but
>>> regexp syntax is obscure enough that I can't quite
>>> get what I want.
>>>
>>> What would be a regexp for all .c and .h files.
>>> In a Unix shell, it would be *.[ch],  What's the
>>> regexp equivalent?
>>
>> .*\.[ch]\'
>
> quick and dirty
>
> \.[ch]$
>
> since the likely hood of existing hidden files `.h' and `.c' is too
> small for the hassle of typing .*

That's not it.  For matching, .* at the beginning is entirely
useless.  If you want to avoid files .c and .h,
.\.[ch]\'
will do the trick.  Replacing \' with $ means that you'll also match
multiline file names like
'x.h
whatever'

Probably not important in dired, but I have some healthy matching
paranoia.  For example, if some joker creates a file (and its
containing directory) named
'-rf
/
guffaw'
which is infrequently cleaned up by a sysadmin script, things can get
ugly if the script has not been written carefully.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum

Re: Regexp for marking source code

[Dieter Wilhelm]

David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> writes:

> Dieter Wilhelm <dieter@duenenhof-wilhelm.de> writes:
>
>> David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> writes:
>>
>>> Ken Goldman <kgold@watson.ibm.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> The dired Q command seems quite useful, but
>>>> regexp syntax is obscure enough that I can't quite
>>>> get what I want.
>>>>
>>>> What would be a regexp for all .c and .h files.
>>>> In a Unix shell, it would be *.[ch],  What's the
>>>> regexp equivalent?
>>>
>>> .*\.[ch]\'
>>
>> quick and dirty
>>
>> \.[ch]$
>>
>> since the likely hood of existing hidden files `.h' and `.c' is too
>> small for the hassle of typing .*
>
> That's not it.  For matching, .* at the beginning is entirely
> useless.  If you want to avoid files .c and .h,
> .\.[ch]\'

You're right, I contradicted myself.  

> will do the trick.  Replacing \' with $ means that you'll also match
> multiline file names like
> 'x.h
> whatever'

Never heard of multiline file names, are they really in use?  But
anyway, this is an instructing example for the `\'' regexp, thanks.

>
> Probably not important in dired, but I have some healthy matching
> paranoia.  For example, if some joker creates a file (and its
> containing directory) named
> '-rf
> /
> guffaw'
> which is infrequently cleaned up by a sysadmin script, things can get
> ugly if the script has not been written carefully.

hmmm ...

rm -rf / guffaw

do you mean that rm then erases the root directory
recursively?  But what is guffaw for?

-- 
    Best wishes

    H. Dieter Wilhelm
    Darmstadt, Germany

Re: Regexp for marking source code

[David Kastrup]

Dieter Wilhelm <dieter@duenenhof-wilhelm.de> writes:

> Never heard of multiline file names, are they really in use?

If people use a file system as a sort of key-lookup system, this can
happen.

>> Probably not important in dired, but I have some healthy matching
>> paranoia.  For example, if some joker creates a file (and its
>> containing directory) named
>> '-rf
>> /
>> guffaw'
>> which is infrequently cleaned up by a sysadmin script, things can get
>> ugly if the script has not been written carefully.
>
> hmmm ...
>
> rm -rf / guffaw
>
> do you mean that rm then erases the root directory
> recursively?  But what is guffaw for?

Just something to put behind '/'.  You can actually write
'-rf
/
'

too, and then the file in the directory "-rf\n" has a file "\n".  Note
that this, in contrast to just spaces in file names, causes damage
even when doing

find /tmp -type f|xargs rm -rf

because then you'll get calls

rm -rf -rf
rm -rf /
rm -rf

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum

Re: Regexp for marking source code

[David Combs]

In article <44d8c969$1@news.greennet.net>,
Ken Goldman  <kgold@watson.ibm.com> wrote:
>The dired Q command seems quite useful, but
>regexp syntax is obscure enough that I can't quite
>get what I want.
>


What *is* this dired "Q" command?

I got into a dired-buf, did C-h k, and typed in Q,
and got this:



q runs the command quit-window
   which is an interactive compiled Lisp function in `window'.
It is bound to q.
(quit-window &optional KILL WINDOW)

Quit the current buffer.  Bury it, and maybe delete the selected frame.
(The frame is deleted if it is contains a dedicated window for the buffer.)
With a prefix argument, kill the buffer instead.

Noninteractively, if KILL is non-nil, then kill the current buffer,
otherwise bury it.

If WINDOW is non-nil, it specifies a window; we delete that window,
and the buffer that is killed or buried is the one in that window.




What am I doing wrong?


Thanks,

David

Re: Regexp for marking source code

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: dkcombs@panix.com (David Combs)
> Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 04:06:28 +0000 (UTC)
> 
> In article <44d8c969$1@news.greennet.net>,
> Ken Goldman  <kgold@watson.ibm.com> wrote:
> >The dired Q command seems quite useful, but
> >regexp syntax is obscure enough that I can't quite
> >get what I want.
> >
> 
> What *is* this dired "Q" command?
> 
> I got into a dired-buf, did C-h k, and typed in Q,
> and got this:
> 
> q runs the command quit-window
> [...]
> What am I doing wrong?

I don't know, but one thing to try is "emacs -q --no-site-file".

Re: Regexp for marking source code

[Arnaldo Mandel]

Eli Zaretskii wrote (on Sep 6, 2006):
 > > From: dkcombs@panix.com (David Combs)
 > > Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 04:06:28 +0000 (UTC)
 > > 
 > > In article <44d8c969$1@news.greennet.net>,
 > > Ken Goldman  <kgold@watson.ibm.com> wrote:
 > > >The dired Q command seems quite useful, but
 > > >regexp syntax is obscure enough that I can't quite
 > > >get what I want.
 > > >
 > > 
 > > What *is* this dired "Q" command?
 > > 
 > > I got into a dired-buf, did C-h k, and typed in Q,
 > > and got this:
 > > 
 > > q runs the command quit-window
 > > [...]
 > > What am I doing wrong?
 > 
 > I don't know, but one thing to try is "emacs -q --no-site-file".

On the other hand, typing a "Q" instead of a "q" may be more
effective.

-- 
Arnaldo Mandel                        
am@ime.usp.br
Talvez você seja um Bright http://the-brights.net Maybe you are a Bright.

Re: Regexp for marking source code

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Arnaldo Mandel <am@ime.usp.br>
> Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 15:10:28 -0300
> 
>  > > I got into a dired-buf, did C-h k, and typed in Q,
>  > > and got this:
>  > > 
>  > > q runs the command quit-window
>  > > [...]
>  > > What am I doing wrong?
>  > 
>  > I don't know, but one thing to try is "emacs -q --no-site-file".
> 
> On the other hand, typing a "Q" instead of a "q" may be more
> effective.

??? He did type "Q", see above.  The fact that Emacs replied with a
lower-case "q" probably means that the upper-case "Q" is unbound
(that's a standard Emacs feature).