From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Feature request: new function start-remote-process Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 10:43:50 +0200 Message-ID: <87ps3dygqh.fsf@gmx.de> References: <87sl8qpueb.fsf@gmx.de> <87k5trkgxn.fsf@gmx.de> <877ipmsbvz.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1183192972 22803 80.91.229.12 (30 Jun 2007 08:42:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 08:42:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 30 10:42:46 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I4YXW-0004Jh-0k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2007 10:42:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I4YXV-0008Ba-6U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2007 04:42:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I4YXQ-0008At-Dv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2007 04:42:40 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I4YXO-0008AB-P2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2007 04:42:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I4YXO-0008A6-HO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2007 04:42:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1I4YXO-0005JI-0P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2007 04:42:38 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 30 Jun 2007 08:42:36 -0000 Original-Received: from p57A22263.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO arthur.local) [87.162.34.99] by mail.gmx.net (mp047) with SMTP; 30 Jun 2007 10:42:36 +0200 X-Authenticated: #3708877 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+d0H0Ci9KddC9adHxncBB/8kTAJJQgJRrZc2seQc Zkz9hSCD/u5B7x In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Fri\, 29 Jun 2007 22\:40\:14 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.97 (gnu/linux) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:74051 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> Do you still object the name? > > Yes, and for the same reasons: the definition of the function makes no > reference to "remote" processes, only to a file-name-handler (which may use > remote processes, of course, but that's not relevant). As I said already, I don't care too much the name (although I still see it different). Does anybody objects "start-file-process", as Stefan proposed? > Stefan Best regards, Michael.