From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: Re: bug#141: Process sentinel not called in batch mode Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 13:23:39 -0400 Message-ID: <87prrm2mec.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <87hcd1kcmz.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1210958659 4093 80.91.229.12 (16 May 2008 17:24:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 17:24:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 141@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, rms@gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, eller.helmut@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii , bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 16 19:24:56 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jx3fp-0000o9-1d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 May 2008 19:24:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53176 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jx3f5-0002Ys-Ao for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 May 2008 13:24:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jx3f0-0002Ya-R0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 May 2008 13:24:02 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jx3ey-0002Xh-P5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 May 2008 13:24:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33969 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jx3et-0002Wq-PN; Fri, 16 May 2008 13:23:55 -0400 Original-Received: from cyd.mit.edu ([18.115.2.24]:44925) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jx3en-0006iF-HF; Fri, 16 May 2008 13:23:49 -0400 Original-Received: by cyd.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B7D7E4E2EC; Fri, 16 May 2008 13:23:39 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Fri, 16 May 2008 12:57:16 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:97277 gmane.emacs.bugs:18019 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > So to repeat/rephrase my question: why doesn't > wait_reading_process_output call status_notify when it is passed a > zero do_display? I don't see any good reason, but the current behavior seems to work OK for !noninteractive.