From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: bug#3936: 23.0.96; doc string of called-interactively-p Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:17:32 +0800 Message-ID: <87prbmwklv.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <09B238050EFB472EBBBFDCFF9B184113@us.oracle.com> <878wiaq3tl.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87r5w2lj6v.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <5D6C9B27AFE44D5BA9E8EC53F6BA9CB9@us.oracle.com> Reply-To: Bastien , 3936@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1248687481 12210 80.91.229.12 (27 Jul 2009 09:38:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:38:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, 3936@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 27 11:37:54 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MVMeR-0006P8-6w for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:37:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33730 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MVMeQ-0005o4-7K for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 05:37:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MVMeJ-0005no-Ot for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 05:37:39 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MVMeE-0005kN-CV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 05:37:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41281 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MVMeD-0005k5-Rp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 05:37:33 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:35332) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MVMeD-0006IJ-3P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 05:37:33 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n6R9bUew011390; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 02:37:31 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n6R9PISI009314; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 02:25:18 -0700 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Bastien Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:25:17 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 3936 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B.12486862818173 (code B ref -1); Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:25:17 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 27 Jul 2009 09:18:01 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n6R9Hjwx008136 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 02:17:47 -0700 Original-Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:39649 helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1MVML3-0007PH-4L for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 05:17:45 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MVMKz-0003AK-Ag for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 05:17:44 -0400 Original-Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.198.249]:48515) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MVMKy-0003A4-O2 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 05:17:40 -0400 Original-Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c5so548189rvf.2 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 02:17:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; bh=CZZorIv+ATwQZ4XVSPxbVezUn6zTppjawO2XmAA3+4M=; b=D/gb5djMf01ciT195GJCtUEyP63kUC/F5bSTpkO33tD6BeJKUvb4u/WegDmK2lR+kL dOsF99MqceEMGgXCSJSyh3JdAe9lLO6swIbMBr9aqGS9Jxw5m8whdItPwk0WVpjPaBmu 70URbzQmeJMZVMRvKHb2D6n6Vrc+xQ1CLk3EI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type; b=G3UTfd+Cu6NPG8W6TIL8mQatNahaHoOplkSXBM0/9tVZxVEW4dkjGg/1pX7KDmKaDM o6k7IOgJ/9YQj544EgcveXcMQvmC2JMjkOqt0kC8R/bcVllR+CDPPaJANfhCnGb4vnuP 4hOrUzGYy3l8mwZuXVmvk/luUJtP075eZtU2g= Original-Received: by 10.140.201.8 with SMTP id y8mr3852736rvf.262.1248686259265; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 02:17:39 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from bzg.ath.cx ([222.29.50.13]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f42sm19251128rvb.45.2009.07.27.02.17.36 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 27 Jul 2009 02:17:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5D6C9B27AFE44D5BA9E8EC53F6BA9CB9@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Mon, 27 Jul 2009 01:18:45 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) Resent-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 05:37:38 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:29654 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:24859 Archived-At: "Drew Adams" writes: > In particular, the doc strings of `called-interactively-p' and `interactive-p' > should, together, make clear their difference. They can't both just say that > they test for an interactive call. They need to speak about keyboard macro use > as the difference in behavior. Please suggest a docstring for both these functions. If your suggested dosctrings are clearer, we will clearly see it. By trying to explain in a very wordy fashion what is *not* clear to you, you're at risk of not being clear yourself. Thanks, -- Bastien