From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: BASE_PURESIZE Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 15:04:53 -0400 Message-ID: <87pr8cehpm.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <8363a6gytm.fsf@gnu.org> <834opqgpzs.fsf@gnu.org> <83skd9f6ok.fsf@gnu.org> <83ljj1exq6.fsf@gnu.org> <200910241727.n9OHReEu007324@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1256411116 12308 80.91.229.12 (24 Oct 2009 19:05:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 19:05:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Andreas Schwab , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dan Nicolaescu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 24 21:05:08 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1N1lvH-0004MX-S2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2009 21:05:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56929 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N1lvH-00074G-Fo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2009 15:05:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N1lvC-00073G-3q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2009 15:05:02 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N1lv7-00072d-Ia for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2009 15:05:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38444 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N1lv7-00072a-FP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2009 15:04:57 -0400 Original-Received: from pantheon-po39.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.100]:50443) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N1lv5-0003v2-76; Sat, 24 Oct 2009 15:04:55 -0400 Original-Received: from furry (dhcp128036014244.central.yale.edu [128.36.14.244]) (authenticated bits=0) by pantheon-po39.its.yale.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n9OJ4rDk024604 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 24 Oct 2009 15:04:53 -0400 Original-Received: by furry (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BC87FC070; Sat, 24 Oct 2009 15:04:53 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <200910241727.n9OHReEu007324@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> (Dan Nicolaescu's message of "Sat, 24 Oct 2009 10:27:40 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-YaleITSMailFilter: Version 1.2c (attachment(s) not renamed) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:116373 Archived-At: Dan Nicolaescu writes: > > We could decide that we don't care too much about the --without-x > > IMHO --without-x is completely unimportant. Not sure what you mean by this statement. If you mean that wasting a few extra kB of memory on --without-x builds isn't important, I can agree with that. But I don't even care about a few extra kB in X builds, personally.