From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Karl Fogel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bzr repository ready? Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 00:23:12 -0600 Message-ID: <87pr70cyzz.fsf@canonical.com> References: <20091118230952.GB908@muc.de> <87my2jw05z.fsf@red-bean.com> <83skc9pbf7.fsf@gnu.org> <87iqd5vw5n.fsf@red-bean.com> <877htl53tc.fsf@telefonica.net> <871vjs6ci7.fsf@telefonica.net> <87d43c4f1e.fsf@telefonica.net> <87ocmwtlbs.fsf@red-bean.com> <87tywnd4iw.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87pr7a9kob.fsf@red-bean.com> <87vdh1sryt.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <873a4591zi.fsf@red-bean.com> <87bpituttt.fsf@red-bean.com> <87ws1hyy8o.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87skc5rqlw.fsf@red-bean.com> <878wdpkq9p.fsf@red-bean.com> <874oocy1po.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> Reply-To: Karl Fogel NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1259562219 13222 80.91.229.12 (30 Nov 2009 06:23:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 06:23:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 30 07:23:32 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NEzfY-0001cu-2C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:23:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56213 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NEzfX-0000Pn-6m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 01:23:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NEzfO-0000P1-9x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 01:23:22 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NEzfL-0000N5-GK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 01:23:20 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34839 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NEzfL-0000Mz-BI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 01:23:19 -0500 Original-Received: from adelie.canonical.com ([91.189.90.139]:35555) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NEzfK-0005TK-Sl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 01:23:19 -0500 Original-Received: from hutte.canonical.com ([91.189.90.181]) by adelie.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69 #1 (Debian)) id 1NEzfJ-00058l-0c; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 06:23:17 +0000 Original-Received: from 173-109-241-128.pools.spcsdns.net ([173.109.241.128] helo=kfogel-work) by hutte.canonical.com with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NEzfI-0001mI-Jf; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 06:23:16 +0000 In-Reply-To: <874oocy1po.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> (Stephen J. Turnbull's message of "Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:18:59 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:117954 Archived-At: "Stephen J. Turnbull" writes: > Looks good. The only thing I question is the cite in the introduction > to Bazaar's Bazaar for CVS Users. The concrete workflow presented > there (ie, with actual bzr command examples) is the one Oscar > recommends, but it's mixed in with a huge amount of extra stuff *plus* > a whole set of workflows that simply cannot be accomplished with the > concrete setup described. Cf. the comment I just added in the > reference section at the end. It used to be "a brief stub". Now it's > > A whirlwind introduction to the features and command-line UI of > Bazaar. The workflow described is very similar to that of > BzrQuickStartForEmacsDevs, and the latter document may be easier > to understand because it concentrates on introducing the workflow > rather than the while field of distributed version control. > > Do you agree with that? If you do, I'll fix it to have an internal > link to References (where the annotation is, and belongs) rather than > a direct link to the document itself. If not, feel free to fix it or > give me a word of guidance and I'll do it. Yes, I agree. Note I've edited BzrForEmacsDevs heavily since you posted the above, but I think what you say still applies.