From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Next pretest, and branching plans Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 10:38:53 +0800 Message-ID: <87pr37y6de.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> References: <4B8147A9.7030504@gmail.com> <87ljemdzxo.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4B83682D.5010804@gnu.org> <4B9B0211.9070308@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1268534365 28049 80.91.229.12 (14 Mar 2010 02:39:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 02:39:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Christoph , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 14 03:39:17 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NqdjY-0003Li-Gd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 03:39:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36549 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NqdjX-0003LW-SG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:39:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NqdjM-0003I6-Ko for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:39:04 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=58579 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NqdjL-0003HS-6W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:39:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NqdjJ-0004Cj-06 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:39:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.160.41]:47491) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NqdjI-0004Cd-QU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:39:00 -0500 Original-Received: by pwj9 with SMTP id 9so1691196pwj.0 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:38:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:received:from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-type; bh=5qf37ZeOosPe8AsecO4qgM0enyH6h4dN0QjqMGy56g0=; b=CbPXL6WvhmwMwcsumUW5M9a1t3khGqt/jxZpA3m+4F7yUJhqNOaWZwpPlrDxK7RL52 4zzWnSy8vzYAXUNWEtTCKtHkRvXYJ6djR9hdAXSa+U0kU+XZE39KlqgbPnoOmIJLykel jNJY2CCqAFz2V7XJaUlu6eMBxdoeqqbbTpApg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=sfUdzxFv5yM/peiJ9Kml2kvj4dyNTyY38xrVhzasKXOQcrx+kJZKY7RmwIYoPEch0+ EbGWx6YsHN+umwMpTMjd2BmCoUUwe/taDBj83nb+0pvkOo7KwYk6JKEzTrOchSNagP3a 9ouIoYGMScI1Mzztg6i1jlbx7BRedoIR9Ahao= Original-Received: by 10.143.153.24 with SMTP id f24mr4033218wfo.307.1268534339689; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:38:59 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from home.jasonrumney.net ([202.87.221.133]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 20sm3614037pzk.15.2010.03.13.18.38.56 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:38:57 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by home.jasonrumney.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CD4D5336; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 10:38:53 +0800 (MYT) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:30:28 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121930 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> Would it make sense to create a 'make package-install' target that omits >> these things (if there is other stuff besides the shortcut, that is more >> intended for a real installation rather than packaging)? When I am packaging >> I don't want the shortcut created. > > To me at least, the name "package-install" would not be helpful. > Something like "install_files_only" would sound more meaningful (or > "install_for_packaging", or ...). My preference would be for make install to install the files only, and a new rule for making shortcuts (install_icons). Most people who build from source on Windows are probably building in the same location all the time, so they don't always need to replace the shortcut. And if they have multiple versions installed, they will want to maintain the shortcut icons manually to avoid having all the versions overwrite each other.