From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: delete-selection-mode Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:55:45 +0200 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <87pr321ul2.fsf@mail.jurta.org> References: <87ocitw2dl.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <201003130001.o2D01FFQ003489@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> <87vdd1yqe4.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87eijjzrkd.fsf_-_@mail.jurta.org> <20100317143519.GB4381@muc.de> <8739zy68n2.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87zl261yta.fsf@telefonica.net> <87sk7y4rdv.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1268863173 6662 80.91.229.12 (17 Mar 2010 21:59:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:59:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 17 22:59:29 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ns1Gz-00009J-2s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:59:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44933 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ns1Gy-000194-Iu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:59:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ns1Gs-00015r-Pw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:59:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36995 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ns1Gr-00012W-90 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:59:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ns1Gp-0006jl-IU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:59:21 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp-out2.starman.ee ([85.253.0.4]:49739 helo=mx2.starman.ee) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ns1Gp-0006jf-Br for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:59:19 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavisd-New at mx2.starman.ee Original-Received: from mail.starman.ee (85.253.49.181.cable.starman.ee [85.253.49.181]) by mx2.starman.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99B853F4075; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:59:12 +0200 (EET) In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:37:18 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:122118 Archived-At: > Please, folks, lets keep to the topic as raised by Juri: `whether the default > should be d-s-mode or just t-m-mode'. Why not discuss other related questions at the same time? Or do you object for doing this without changing the Subject line? > That question is plenty big enough. We can still bring in questions of who the > default behavior (for this) should be most aimed at, and other relevant > questions that have already been broached. Maybe this question needs a poll. I suspect the outcome will be something around 95% vs 5% ;-) -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/