From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Wrong commit message. What to do now? Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 00:43:13 +0200 Message-ID: <87pqyrc8am.fsf@telefonica.net> References: <8739vndo36.fsf@red-bean.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1279061018 11107 80.91.229.12 (13 Jul 2010 22:43:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 22:43:38 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 14 00:43:35 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OYoCM-0001dx-GX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 00:43:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37085 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OYoCL-0007nd-V6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 18:43:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55282 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OYoCF-0007mj-EP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 18:43:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OYoCB-0004Ry-7L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 18:43:25 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:50390) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OYoCA-0004Rg-SH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 18:43:23 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OYoC9-0001bN-Dd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 00:43:21 +0200 Original-Received: from 83.42.13.171 ([83.42.13.171]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 00:43:21 +0200 Original-Received: from ofv by 83.42.13.171 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 00:43:21 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 12 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.42.13.171 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:N8dGk8hWg0czjFbaaheqix89SmQ= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:127227 Archived-At: Karl Fogel writes: [snip] > The ChangeLog is correct; just the bzr commit message is wrong. Does > anyone know if there's anything that can be done about this? Aren't you the guy who work on the same office as the Bazaar hackers? ;-) [snip]