From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Dashes in mode-line Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 23:51:14 +0800 Message-ID: <87pqv6uqod.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> References: <87lj5u1ni6.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1287503611 2541 80.91.229.12 (19 Oct 2010 15:53:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 15:53:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Julien Danjou , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 19 17:53:30 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P8EVE-0006gq-7C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 17:53:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49515 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P8EVD-0007GB-HL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 11:53:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42640 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P8EU9-0006nB-8s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 11:52:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P8ETh-0005Ua-PA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 11:52:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-iw0-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169]:54651) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P8ETB-0005P7-O1; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 11:51:21 -0400 Original-Received: by iwn1 with SMTP id 1so2949206iwn.0 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 08:51:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:received:from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-type; bh=ssk9GzZTvuKEiQOuV9/At17l86zU6wgOnzwyjD+yA9Q=; b=q5kZeYUYb/0uIxkMUZVKI/pSPxgSAQCimyiVMTqftmsStpeEboWWLJ2Bqpoq5zPcRI j2LFpTMbJcoyPLQkT34C0RVIP2Cgweib6+N5Z7exsq54xEPuYiu0Z6IYW5q2EtmveMpD GObedFlysk+WMwHGiVw6L7+8/ZCrS5sN2/oL4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=OTRmPd+A1VEciA7oRBzOzpvFYQc4uOXNZx17UUQfebZv8kdCBvYAeerUcT9+5NNeIf eRAMFI2jKj3+Zx9eI6IojDjh1feEuPqbJ8R8WM3/tlbS2PMWq+sTSKEgTwH21cIIZ8rU bUfI3AFOcq+xw76S8s0uOq+NcRuNqIFdgk3Ks= Original-Received: by 10.231.190.149 with SMTP id di21mr4947036ibb.166.1287503480279; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 08:51:20 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from home.jasonrumney.net ([202.87.221.130]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n28sm5599317yha.16.2010.10.19.08.51.17 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 19 Oct 2010 08:51:19 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by home.jasonrumney.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7CF611755; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 23:51:14 +0800 (MYT) In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 19 Oct 2010 09:09:11 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:131840 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Julien Danjou >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 12:32:33 +0200 >> >> + `(:eval (unless window-system >> + ,(propertize "-%-" 'help-echo help-echo))))) > > Using window-system is not right here, because the DOS port defines a > non-nil value, but uses a text terminal. Can we fix that if we intend on keeping the DOS port around? I know defining window-system to non-nil used to be the only way to get font-lock and other features that the DOS port has had for longer than other text terminals, but is there any reason for it now other than historical continuity?