From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7758: 24.0.50; doc string and args of `dired-revert' Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 15:06:47 -0500 Message-ID: <87pqrn75bc.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <4C083E1AA7374145BE4DE04F8E028E11@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1295814324 31295 80.91.229.12 (23 Jan 2011 20:25:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 20:25:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7758@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 23 21:25:15 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ph6Ut-0008Fk-0E for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 21:25:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55613 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ph6Us-0002TO-7N for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 15:25:14 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59346 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ph6Uk-0002T1-J9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 15:25:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ph6Uf-0000wi-AA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 15:25:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:45971) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ph6Uf-0000we-7I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 15:25:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ph65V-0004Dn-LH; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 14:59:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 19:59:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7758 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7758-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7758.129581273416213 (code B ref 7758); Sun, 23 Jan 2011 19:59:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7758) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jan 2011 19:58:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ph65O-0004DS-0r for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 14:58:54 -0500 Original-Received: from vm-emlprdomr-03.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.144]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ph65L-0004DH-Lj for 7758@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 14:58:51 -0500 Original-Received: from furball (162.254.218.209.transedge.com [209.218.254.162]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-03.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p0NK6okc015809 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 23 Jan 2011 15:06:51 -0500 Original-Received: by furball (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E248E16075F; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 15:06:47 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <4C083E1AA7374145BE4DE04F8E028E11@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Wed, 29 Dec 2010 11:10:31 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.144 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 14:59:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:43569 Archived-At: "Drew Adams" writes: > The doc string should say that there are two optionl arguments and they > are never used. And it should say explicitly that this is because this > function is used as a value of `revert-buffer-function'. The last part > is important - users should be able to see the connection easily. Fixed, thanks.